Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) politicians are drooling over the case in which senior Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) politician Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) is suspected of taking a bribe when he was Taoyuan mayor.
His tenure was from 2014 to 2022.
WHAT HAPPENED?
Cheng was released on bail twice last week, but was denied bail on Friday.
Immediately after Cheng was first granted bail, KMT Taoyuan City Councilor Ling Tao (凌濤) dug up that the father of the judge who granted the bail used to be one of Cheng’s political advisers.
Ling insulted the judge by suggesting that he granted bail based on his connection with Cheng.
DISTORTION
Later, KMT Taipei City Councilor Yu Shu-hui (游淑慧) over-interpreted a remark that President William Lai (賴清德) made on July 6 in response to a reporter’s question.
Yu interpreted his remark as meaning that “Lai is a ruthless person.”
She suggested that the case against Cheng involves political infighting within the DPP.
Yu said that Lai is worried that Cheng could threaten his chances of being re-elected in 2028.
Yu alleged that when Lai said that cracking down on corruption is an important task for the government, he was implying that Cheng is guilty of corruption.
SPECULATION
These two KMT politicians — Ling and Yu — are making things up as they go along. As well as maligning Taiwan’s judiciary, they have also insulted the president who was elected by Taiwanese.
These two politicians’ remarks show how political disruptions in Taiwan are being stirred up for ulterior motives.
FAIR JUDGEMENT
Cheng’s case is being investigated and no charges have been filed against him yet.
Even if he is charged, he would not necessarily be convicted and the judicial process should be respected.
Cheng should be given the right to fair treatment.
It is normal for judges to decide whether to grant bail based on consideration of the conditions, so it is wrong to use insinuations about “connections” to insist that a bail should not be granted.
As for Yu’s suggestion that Lai’s words were meant to “deliberately incriminate” Cheng, her purpose was to sully the president’s personality and undermine the public’s trust in the head of state.
“Cracking down on fraud, gangs and corruption are important tasks for the government,” Lai told the reporter.
As well as mentioning “cracking down on corruption,” Lai also said that prosecutors should investigate any kind of illegal activity.
Yu’s cherry-picking what Lai said out of context was an obvious attempt to stir up trouble for political gain.
It was a very sneaky move.
CASE ONGOING
It seems strange that the prosecutors have chosen this moment to broaden the investigation of a seven-year-old case.
When handling legal cases, a judgement should be based on the evidence.
It is not acceptable to speculate or take shortcuts.
To handle a case based on which way the wind is blowing is a major taboo in the judicial world.
The public are watching this case with open eyes, and they are unlikely to allow powerful people to play games.
Chen Chi-nung works in the field of culture and history.
Translated by Julian Clegg
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS