It has been reported that a Chinese correspondent has been involved in the production of a pro-China Taiwanese political talk show and supervising the filming. If true, the TV station
might be fined NT$2 million (US$61,482), the National Communications Commission has said.
Some news media and political programs in Taiwan are already speaking on behalf of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). They even act like the CCP’s propaganda tools, such as China Central Television, covering up scandals and promoting the CCP’s so-called “achievements.” This type of news channel has the effect of confusing Taiwanese about where exactly do they live.
Independent Legislator May Chin (高金素梅) recently referred to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) as “our President Xi.” Pro-China media in Taiwan even openly mimic Xi’s words and try to brainwash Taiwanese.
It has been more than two years since Russia invaded Ukraine and pro-China channels have often taken the side of Russia, criticizing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy’s strategies against the invasion.
These channels are always finding an excuse for Russia. Therefore, Taiwanese exposed to such news media would agree with the denouncement of Zelenskiy for not prioritizing Ukrainian citizens and focusing only on defeating Russia.
The channels are criticizing the victim instead of the invader, confusing fact from fiction.
Recently the China Coast Guard fought the Philippine Navy in a confrontation in which blood was spilled. Pro-China media in Taiwan reported that the Philippines was challenging China’s powerful People’s Liberation Army Navy, and ended up embarrassing itself.
To align with the CCP’s intention to attack Taiwan “separatists,” pro-China media turn their back on their own people, blaming President William Lai (賴清德) for separating “one China” and allowing himself to become a tool of the US.
However, these media outlets lack the courage to speak up for Taiwanese democracy. As Lai has said, democracy is not a crime, and autocracy is the real “evil.”
Taiwanese should fight against media that spread fake news and demand that the government punish the broadcaster or ban such broadcasts.
Only when we banish “red media” from Taiwan can we genuinely appreciate the value of democracy.
Chen Chi-nung is a political commentator.
Translated by Hsieh Yi-ching
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS