US aerospace company Boeing Co has in recent years been involved in numerous safety incidents, including crashes of its 737 Max airliners, which have caused widespread concern about the company’s safety record.
It has recently come to light that titanium jet engine parts used by Boeing and its European competitor Airbus SE were sold with falsified documentation.
The source of the titanium used in these parts has been traced back to an unknown Chinese company.
It is clear that China is trying to sneak questionable titanium materials into the supply chain and use any ensuing problems as an opportunity to raise doubts about international relations and aviation safety.
In the midst of competition between the world’s two most powerful nations — the US and China — the latter has supplied counterfeit titanium materials to Boeing.
In so doing, China has tried to cause a US plane to crash, which would spread fear among the US public and cause Americans to distrust their own government, believing that this problem arose because US officials failed to strictly monitor the situation.
It would also have a negative impact on the reputation of Boeing aircraft.
China’s provision of counterfeit titanium materials to Boeing could also have a negative effect on Boeing’s sales performance in the US and foreign markets. A decline in Boeing’s sales would be sure to have a heavy impact on the US’ military and civil aviation industries.
That would give China an opportunity to develop its own aerospace industry and even surpass the US to become the new world leader in the aerospace sector.
Apart from the above-mentioned strategies, China is also trying to spread fear internationally so that other countries that buy Boeing products become distrustful of the US, in the belief that the US deliberately sells substandard products to make money from other countries and use the ill-gotten wealth to increase its investments.
China’s actions therefore go beyond undermining the US’ relations with its allies. China can also exploit each and every opportunity to gain more allies for itself.
China is prepared to take extreme measures to counter the US’ military might, even putting people’s lives at risk by exporting problematic titanium materials to the US. Such unscrupulous behavior in pursuit of its goals has triggered harsh criticism from around the world.
The Chinese Communist Party has never shied away from sacrificing human lives to achieve its goals, so we must be especially cautious about any products that are made in China.
Chen Chun is an international affairs researcher.
Translated by Julian Clegg
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS