Silicon Valley’s “move fast and break things” mantra propelled tech innovation for the Internet age. In the era of artificial intelligence (AI), it should take a leaf out of Japan’s playbook and slow down.
A rush to deploy AI tools to the public has resulted in embarrassing blunders, from an AI-powered Google search feature recently recommending glue on pizza, to consequences that can impact real people’s livelihoods, like the technology behind OpenAI’s ChatGPT showing signs of racial bias when ranking job applicants, as a Bloomberg analysis found.
It has also led to tech companies consuming enormous amounts of energy to power AI. The International Energy Agency estimates that the total electricity consumption for data centers across the globe would be about the same as the power demand of Japan in 2026. Other forecasters say that by 2030, these centers are on course to use more energy than India, the world’s most populous country. Large language models, the technology underpinning the latest crop of generative AI tools, require gargantuan troves of data and training them takes immense amounts of computing power and energy.
Illustration: Yusha
As the tech continues to develop, many AI firms think the key to growth is to make these large language models even larger. Some US tech titans including Microsoft Corp cofounder Bill Gates and OpenAI chief executive officer Sam Altman are even backing nuclear energy firms to help power AI data centers. However, there are other options beyond rushing to fire up new nuclear reactors to train AI models.
Tokyo-based startup Sakana AI — which Nikkei Asia reported on June 15 would become the fastest-ever Japanese company to achieve unicorn status — has taken a different approach. When it comes to the most consequential technology of our time, they are playing the long game.
“Sakana,” which means “fish” in Japanese, was created last year by David Ha, Ren Ito and Llion Jones with the goal of applying nature-inspired ideas such as evolution and collective intelligence to create AI models, and not gobbling up as much energy as possible to train a single AI model. Jones, notably, coauthored the seminal 2017 research paper while at Google that underpins the technology of today’s most popular AI products, including ChatGPT, and spurred much of the current boom.
Ha told me that much of the issues facing AI stem from companies prematurely deploying the technology in search of short-term profits, while disregarding the high energy toll. While Sakana’s technology could be used to create a virtual girlfriend chatbot now, they are more focused on researching ways to apply AI to solve real-world issues. This is in line with other Japan-based AI companies the West might have never heard of, such as Preferred Networks, which is trying to develop more energy-efficient AI chips.
Silicon Valley needs to start playing the more long game, too. The world does not need more useless chatbots that generate bad poetry — or perpetuate racist biases at scale — while consuming unsustainable swaths of resources. This way of thinking could have also spared some of the embarrassing headlines that have turned much of the public against embracing AI for good.
Sakana’s most recent research is looking at new ways of producing AI models that do not require extensive amounts of energy, and it has longer-term ambitions of helping Japan at a national scale come up with real solutions to some of its most pressing issues, including a looming labor crunch. Their mission has received support from the Japanese government.
In Japan, depopulation and a shrinking workforce have led to a public and private sector ecosystem that seeks to embrace the emerging technology’s possibilities with curiosity and hope instead of despair. There is a sense of urgency around the idea that these tools can help solve labor shortages — with less of the existential fears that they would end up replacing human workers. Microsoft Japan president Miki Tsusaka touted generative AI’s power to accelerate growth in a nation with an aging population in an interview with Bloomberg TV last week. Her comments come on the heels of Microsoft announcing it would spend about US$2.9 billion, its biggest-ever investment in Japan, to increase cloud computing and AI infrastructure.
Being a close US ally has also helped Japan in the current boom — it has welcomed a spate of US tech investment that might have previously been funneled toward China.
Along with Microsoft, OpenAI opened its first Asia office in Tokyo this spring, while Oracle Corp pledged to put more than US$8 billion over the next 10 years into cloud computing and AI.
Risk-averse Japan lost its place as a global tech leader during the past few decades, but the AI boom, still in its infancy, is an entirely different beast. This time around, its cautious and collective approach to the technology means Tokyo is uniquely positioned to come out ahead when it comes to getting AI right. The rest of the world might soon find itself playing catch-up.
Catherine Thorbecke is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asia tech. Previously she was a tech reporter at CNN and ABC News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS