The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has once again resorted to its age-old tactic of blaming the US for China’s woes. The Financial Times on Sunday reported that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) told European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen that China would not invade Taiwan because it was a trap set by the US. This is not just an attempt to deflect blame, but also a textbook example of the CCP’s “divide and conquer” strategy to sow discord between Europe and the US.
However, the blame game reveals deeper problems.
Xi’s power rests on the support of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), which he has bought off through a distorted allocation of resources. Maintaining the threat of military action against Taiwan serves the interests of the CCP and the PLA, but with China’s ongoing economic woes, this arrangement is becoming unsustainable.
Xi saying that it is a US conspiracy behind the push for military unification makes one wonder if the CCP is seeking a way to justify military spending cuts.
For years the CCP has used the threat of military force against Taiwan to keep its indoctrinated supporters in line. They have peddled the narrative that, sooner or later, the nationalist goal of unification will be achieved.
However, as the feasibility of this goal diminishes, the CCP finds itself in a bind. If it does not act, it risks a backlash from the very nationalism that it has cultivated.
The CCP, once wary of the forces that could be unleashed through nationalism, embraced fanaticism after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Eventually, nationalism took on a life of its own, leaving the CCP with no choice but to blame the US and the rest of the West for its problems. As economic growth slows, stoking nationalist sentiment is the CCP’s only trick to legitimize its monopoly on political power.
The CCP, like the Qing Dynasty before it, finds itself grappling with the double-edged sword of nationalism. The Qing’s downfall was precipitated by the Boxer Rebellion, a nationalist uprising supported by the Qing Empress Dowager Cixi (慈禧太后), who saw it as a useful tool to consolidate power and rally support.
However, when the rebellion’s violence spiraled out of control, regional military leaders refused to heed the call of duty. This refusal, known as the Mutual Protection of Southeast China movement, significantly weakened the Qing’s authority and contributed to the dynasty’s eventual collapse.
The CCP, having stoked the flames of nationalism for its survival, now risks a similar fate. If it fails to deliver on its promises or its nationalist rhetoric leads to conflicts it cannot control, it might find its authority undermined, as happened to the Qing more than a century ago.
We Hong Kongers experienced firsthand the toxicity of CCP’s nationalistic schemes.
Since the 2014 “Umbrella movement,” the CCP has consistently accused our democratic activists of being traitors and foreign agents.
In 2019, when the CCP overstepped by pushing the extradition bill through the Hong Kong Legislative Council, Hong Kongers took to the streets in mass protests, demanding the bill’s withdrawal.
Our five demands were straightforward: Total withdrawal of the extradition bill, retraction of the “riot” characterization of the protests, release of arrested protesters, an independent investigation into police brutality and the implementation of universal suffrage.
None of these demands had anything to do with foreign interference, let alone the US. Yet, the CCP’s propaganda machine went into overdrive, using every trick in the book to paint us as collaborators with foreign powers, especially the US. It spread disinformation and fake news, and manipulated social media to push its narrative.
The ultra-nationalist “little pinks” in China, brainwashed by the CCP’s propaganda, now harbor a deep hatred for Hong Kong and Hong Kongers, seeing us as traitorous puppets of the West, rather than fellow citizens fighting for our fundamental rights and freedoms.
The CCP might cloak itself in ideological rhetoric, but it is a practitioner of raw political realism at its core. Its strategy is simple yet effective: Divide and conquer. By sowing seeds of distrust, hatred and conflict among the public, the CCP aims to fragment society into disparate, warring factions. This fragmentation serves a dual purpose:
First, it prevents the formation of a unified opposition that could challenge the party’s authority.
Second, it creates a climate of fear and uncertainty in which the public, desperate for stability and security, are more likely to turn to the CCP as their protector and savior.
It is a bleak vision of society, one in which the state thrives on the discord and misery of its citizens. However, for the CCP, it is a price worth paying to preserve its power and privilege.
Many China observers praise the CCP’s long-term strategic thinking, but I disagree. The inconsistencies in its narratives reveal a myopic, play-by-play approach. The parallels between the CCP and the late Qing are becoming increasingly apparent. The CCP, like the dynasties before it, is riding a tiger it cannot dismount. That, I believe, is the reality Xi faces.
Simon Lee is a former executive and columnist of Hong Kong’s now-defunct Apple Daily who moved to the US in 2020.
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS