Major figures from Google, Nvidia and AMD converged in Taipei early this month and announced plans to boost their investments in Taiwan — now a global production powerhouse for artificial intelligence (AI) technology, drawing attention from across the globe. However, Taiwan must still contend with opposition parties’ expansion of power, damaging of the nation’s democratic and human rights systems, and its impact on Taiwan’s image abroad. The hobbling of democratic institutions, and the impact on the government and the international community’s perception of Taiwanese democracy could affect foreign investment.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is pairing up with the Executive Yuan to propose a review of controversial bills. On Friday last week, the DPP launched a nationwide “oppose abuse of power, let the public lead” drive to help the public understand how the bills impact their rights and interests, and the effective operation of institutions and the government.
Civic groups could make strong inroads by holding discussions and forums, opening town hall meetings, and utilizing social media forums and online media to explain why the Executive Yuan has requested a reconsideration of the bills that would expand the Legislative Yuan’s power, and how such legislation would harm human rights and hamper the government’s ability to govern. Movements such as the Bluebird movement could consolidate civic strength against opposition party oppression, compel a review of the legislation and lead to the bills’ recension.
If the legislature rejects the call for a review, civic groups should support the Executive Yuan and the DPP’s request for a constitutional interpretation of the laws, and initiate recall petitions for malicious lawmakers. For the latter to succeed, civic groups should carefully build their case based on solid reasoning. The goal should be to elevate the quality of government inquiry.
Discourse surrounding recalls should redefine how these amendments are disturbing society and damaging the government, and how they would impact national development, human rights and interests. Before recalls can take place in February next year, there is about eight months to get the ball rolling. Civic groups ought to continue entrenching civic movements, transforming them from recall drives to social movements that promote civic education. They could set the foundation for exceptional, democratically governed structures that would allow the public to handily veto these amendments should they go through a public referendum.
To achieve the goal of civic education, civic groups should hold intensive seminars, speeches, televised media and stage performances, to get society to understand the power of local factions and networks, and that those holding vested interests would harm the public’s rights and interests, the development of local industries and the quality of public infrastructure.
An excellent democratic government cannot have ties to corrupt local power, factions or vested interests at any level. It should respect the development of local industries and the nation’s economy, promote public infrastructure, and expound progressive values and reformist mindsets. It should cast off traditional patronage networks and factions, and the intertwining of interpersonal patronage relationships and influential local officials. It should establish an excellent public society.
By holding talks and forums across the nation, the DPP could elevate the quality of Taiwanese democracy. To deepen democracy, the DPP could follow the lead of the civic groups such as the Bluebird movement, bolstering cooperation and support, and divide and conquer.
Michael Lin is a retired diplomat, formerly posted in the US.
Translated by Tim Smith
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling
Mainland Affairs Council Deputy Minister Shen You-chung (沈有忠) on Thursday last week urged democratic nations to boycott China’s military parade on Wednesday next week. The parade, a grand display of Beijing’s military hardware, is meant to commemorate the 80th anniversary of Japan’s surrender in World War II. While China has invited world leaders to attend, many have declined. A Kyodo News report on Sunday said that Japan has asked European and Asian leaders who have yet to respond to the invitation to refrain from attending. Tokyo is seeking to prevent Beijing from spreading its distorted interpretation of wartime history, the report
RSS