A splintering of global supply chains, driven by political and business considerations, has hundreds of manufacturers and logistics providers debating where to go next. They would be well advised to take their cues from two Taiwanese companies who have led the charge.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) is the world’s largest maker of chips, with clients including Apple Inc, Nvidia Corp and Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
Foxconn Technology Group, whose flagship is Taipei-based Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, assembles those components into end devices. Apple’s iPhones and Nvidia’s artificial intelligence servers are among the most famous of Foxconn’s products, but its reach extends into industrial sectors including Tesla Inc cars, factory-automation systems provider Siemens AG and even an Israeli satellite maker.
Illustration: Constance Chou
Their size, technical dominance and global influence make these two Taiwanese companies irreplaceable — no other single business could jump in to fill the gap should either disappear overnight. That is the concern policymakers from Washington to Canberra have in the event tensions between Taipei and Beijing escalate to the point of military conflict.
However, both firms are thinking less about war and more about how globalization can extend their lead.
“Instability in the Taiwan Strait is definitely one supply chain-resilience consideration,” TSMC chairman and chief executive officer C.C. Wei (魏哲家) said after its annual shareholder meeting this month. Yet the chipmaker also seen benefits from globalization “because we can get the best from around the world.”
Foxconn has also been touting the upside of its expanded reach. “Our diversified global footprint is an important part of Hon Hai’s competitive advantage,” chief executive officer Young Liu (劉揚偉) told shareholders recently, adding that it has 205 sites in 24 countries. “In the current geopolitical situation, that advantage is even more important and obvious.”
Two decades after joining the WTO, China’s position as factory to the world has shifted from being a win-win for clients and suppliers to a massive risk. Labor shortages, rising costs and stiff local competition have many looking elsewhere. Japanese and South Korean carmakers are withdrawing, US power-tool maker Stanley Black & Decker shut its factory, and Nike Inc has moved away.
TSMC and Foxconn do not supply directly to all of these companies, but they are only one step away. Almost every device on the planet is made with, or by, the goods that come out of their factories. TSMC, for example, not only controls most production of leading-edge chips, it is the single largest supplier of older (also called legacy) 28-nanometer semiconductors that go into toys, and industrial and agricultural equipment. Foxconn, though best known for churning out consumer devices, is a major player in industrial manufacturing and factory automation.
That means the site of new facilities from either company act as a guidepost for where the rest of the supply chain is already going, or ought to move next.
Take TSMC. Although it does not make cars, the company has chosen locations at the center of the automotive supply chain. Volkswagen AG, BMW AG and Porsche all have facilities near Dresden, the site of TSMC’s forthcoming European fab. Co-investors in that factory include Robert Bosch GmbH, Infineon Technologies AG and NXP Semiconductors NV. As a result, anyone who wants to supply materials or equipment to TSMC would need to have operations near the German city.
For its factory in Japan’s Kumamoto Prefecture, TSMC is teaming up with Sony Group Corp, Toyota Motor Corp and automotive-electronics supplier Denso Corp. This facility would serve Japan’s world-leading carmaking, industrial and consumer electronics industries. The expansion plan, announced in 2021, spurred suppliers Mitsubishi Electric Corp, Sumco Corp and Kyocera Corp to outline new investments in the area.
TSMC’s facility in Arizona is a different story. There is no business case to be made for setting up there: The region lacks any related industries of note. However, pressure from clients, and incentives from US governments at the state and federal level, left the Taiwanese company little choice. Even then, suppliers were quick to follow, including industrial companies LCY Chemical Corp and Topco Scientific Co.
Foxconn’s decision to expand in Mexico, India and Southeast Asia as well as numerous tie-ups with European industrial companies like Siemens, ZF Group and Stellantis NV show that its diversification is not only geographic but also sector-based. The company is pushing into factory automation, transportation and logistics, aerospace and alternative energy. Many of its current vendors built facilities in Shenzhen to enjoy the benefits of being close to China’s manufacturing heartland.
This Foxconn effect was repeated over a decade ago when it set up near central China’s Zhengzhou city and suppliers followed suit.
Now, because of their crucial role at the center of industry, not only would the same entourage of vendors to TSMC and Foxconn need to tag along on their global journey, anyone else expecting to be part of international supply chains would have no choice but to follow, too.
Tim Culpan is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology in Asia. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
RSS