It has been 35 years since up to one million protesters took to the streets in Beijing to demand political reform; 35 years since students erected the Goddess of Democracy on Tiananmen Square; and 35 years since tanks rolled into the city center, crushing the movement with extreme prejudice. Hundreds or thousands of people were killed in the crackdown, not just in Beijing but in cities across the country. Thousands more were imprisoned, tortured, or executed in the aftermath. Many fled China, ending up in Hong Kong, Europe, the United States, or Taiwan.
It is easy to look back on the Tiananmen Square Massacre and think that the bad, old days are behind us. After all, there have been protests in China in the three decades since Chinese soldiers opened fire on their unarmed fellow citizens, but the tanks have not again been called from their depots.
But although one can be glad that the Chinese Communist Party has not, since 1989, seen fit to set its war machine upon the people it purports to represent, one should also recognize that Tiananmen was not an anomaly, but rather a portent of what was to come. To be sure, China has grown prosperous over the last 35 years, many of its people enjoy a quality of life that may have been difficult to imagine in the 1980s, and it has experienced some periods of relative openness. Yet the darkness that settled over China on the night of June 3-4 never truly lifted.
When thousands of Falun Gong practitioners unexpectedly gathered outside Zhongnanhai in 1999, the Party’s response was quieter than in 1989 but no less brutal. It utterly crushed the religious movement in China, dispersing its remnants to the far corners of the earth. Those who did not escape China faced detention and torture. Ultimately, the Party found a new use for them — or, more accurately, for the organs that Party doctors forcibly harvested from their broken bodies.
In March 2008, just months before the Beijing Summer Olympics, mostly non-violent protests swept across the Tibetan plateau. Here, the story gets repetitive: the Party’s security apparatus resorted to murder, disappearances, and torture. It then redoubled efforts to suppress Tibetan culture, Tibetan Buddhism, and Tibetan language. This attempt at cultural genocide is ongoing.
Later in 2008, more than 300 prominent Chinese intellectuals, professionals, activists, and cultural luminaries released Charter ’08. The document declared that “the era of emperors and overlords is on the way out” and called for “a system of liberties, democracy, and the rule of law.” It was not long before Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波), one of the charter’s remarkably brave organizers, was detained. He had previously served time after Tiananmen and again in the late 1990s. In 2010, he would become one of just a handful of Nobel Peace Prize laureates to have earned the award while behind bars; seven years later, he would become the first laureate to die in prison.
The Party’s response to Charter ’08 marked the beginning of a much more aggressive effort to restrain civil society in China. In the years since, activists of various stripes have found themselves under the gun. Foreign non-governmental organizations now face significant operational restrictions. In 2015, hundreds of human rights lawyers and related activists were rounded up and silenced. Xi Jinping (習近平) has launched an all-out war on religious practice.
Xi’s human rights record is abominable. China has been credibly accused of carrying out a genocide in Xinjiang. Stories of forcible detention, physical and psychological torture, sexual violence, and medical experimentation shock but do not surprise. Uyghur children have been separated from their families and placed in boarding schools where they may not speak their language or practice their religion. Forced labor is rampant.
In Hong Kong, the Communist Party wiped out the city’s civil rights virtually overnight — but not before millions of Hong Kongers, for months on end, turned out to defend the freedoms they held dear. In 2021, media mogul and protest supporter Jimmy Lai (黎智英) was sentenced to 13 months in prison for “incitement to knowingly take part in an authorized assembly.” (He now stands trial again for national security and sedition offenses.)
That arrest and conviction were tragically poetic: The unlawful assembly was a vigil for the victims of Tiananmen. “If commemorating those who died because of injustice is a crime,” Lai wrote in a statement to the court, “then inflict on me that crime and let me suffer the punishment of this crime, so I may share the burden and glory of those young men and women who shed blood on June 4 to proclaim truth, justice, and goodness.”
This, perhaps, is the legacy of Tiananmen. On the night of June 3, 1989, the Chinese Communist Party declared war on the Chinese people. It has waged that ongoing war with ruthless efficiency and remorseless brutality. It has tortured, disappeared, silenced, repressed, and terrorized. But the Party has failed to snuff out the flame lit on Tiananmen Square thirty-five years ago. Across the decades and across China’s vast expanse, the hopeful have continued to tend the flame, awaiting the moment when mere embers can spark a wildfire.
Michael Mazza is a senior director at the Project 2049 Institute and a senior non-resident fellow at the Global Taiwan Institute.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS