It has been 35 years since up to one million protesters took to the streets in Beijing to demand political reform; 35 years since students erected the Goddess of Democracy on Tiananmen Square; and 35 years since tanks rolled into the city center, crushing the movement with extreme prejudice. Hundreds or thousands of people were killed in the crackdown, not just in Beijing but in cities across the country. Thousands more were imprisoned, tortured, or executed in the aftermath. Many fled China, ending up in Hong Kong, Europe, the United States, or Taiwan.
It is easy to look back on the Tiananmen Square Massacre and think that the bad, old days are behind us. After all, there have been protests in China in the three decades since Chinese soldiers opened fire on their unarmed fellow citizens, but the tanks have not again been called from their depots.
But although one can be glad that the Chinese Communist Party has not, since 1989, seen fit to set its war machine upon the people it purports to represent, one should also recognize that Tiananmen was not an anomaly, but rather a portent of what was to come. To be sure, China has grown prosperous over the last 35 years, many of its people enjoy a quality of life that may have been difficult to imagine in the 1980s, and it has experienced some periods of relative openness. Yet the darkness that settled over China on the night of June 3-4 never truly lifted.
When thousands of Falun Gong practitioners unexpectedly gathered outside Zhongnanhai in 1999, the Party’s response was quieter than in 1989 but no less brutal. It utterly crushed the religious movement in China, dispersing its remnants to the far corners of the earth. Those who did not escape China faced detention and torture. Ultimately, the Party found a new use for them — or, more accurately, for the organs that Party doctors forcibly harvested from their broken bodies.
In March 2008, just months before the Beijing Summer Olympics, mostly non-violent protests swept across the Tibetan plateau. Here, the story gets repetitive: the Party’s security apparatus resorted to murder, disappearances, and torture. It then redoubled efforts to suppress Tibetan culture, Tibetan Buddhism, and Tibetan language. This attempt at cultural genocide is ongoing.
Later in 2008, more than 300 prominent Chinese intellectuals, professionals, activists, and cultural luminaries released Charter ’08. The document declared that “the era of emperors and overlords is on the way out” and called for “a system of liberties, democracy, and the rule of law.” It was not long before Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波), one of the charter’s remarkably brave organizers, was detained. He had previously served time after Tiananmen and again in the late 1990s. In 2010, he would become one of just a handful of Nobel Peace Prize laureates to have earned the award while behind bars; seven years later, he would become the first laureate to die in prison.
The Party’s response to Charter ’08 marked the beginning of a much more aggressive effort to restrain civil society in China. In the years since, activists of various stripes have found themselves under the gun. Foreign non-governmental organizations now face significant operational restrictions. In 2015, hundreds of human rights lawyers and related activists were rounded up and silenced. Xi Jinping (習近平) has launched an all-out war on religious practice.
Xi’s human rights record is abominable. China has been credibly accused of carrying out a genocide in Xinjiang. Stories of forcible detention, physical and psychological torture, sexual violence, and medical experimentation shock but do not surprise. Uyghur children have been separated from their families and placed in boarding schools where they may not speak their language or practice their religion. Forced labor is rampant.
In Hong Kong, the Communist Party wiped out the city’s civil rights virtually overnight — but not before millions of Hong Kongers, for months on end, turned out to defend the freedoms they held dear. In 2021, media mogul and protest supporter Jimmy Lai (黎智英) was sentenced to 13 months in prison for “incitement to knowingly take part in an authorized assembly.” (He now stands trial again for national security and sedition offenses.)
That arrest and conviction were tragically poetic: The unlawful assembly was a vigil for the victims of Tiananmen. “If commemorating those who died because of injustice is a crime,” Lai wrote in a statement to the court, “then inflict on me that crime and let me suffer the punishment of this crime, so I may share the burden and glory of those young men and women who shed blood on June 4 to proclaim truth, justice, and goodness.”
This, perhaps, is the legacy of Tiananmen. On the night of June 3, 1989, the Chinese Communist Party declared war on the Chinese people. It has waged that ongoing war with ruthless efficiency and remorseless brutality. It has tortured, disappeared, silenced, repressed, and terrorized. But the Party has failed to snuff out the flame lit on Tiananmen Square thirty-five years ago. Across the decades and across China’s vast expanse, the hopeful have continued to tend the flame, awaiting the moment when mere embers can spark a wildfire.
Michael Mazza is a senior director at the Project 2049 Institute and a senior non-resident fellow at the Global Taiwan Institute.
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS