The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has been markedly escalating its military infiltration activities aimed at Taiwan.
Retired air force lieutenant colonel Tu Yung-hsin (杜永心), who went to China to start a business, was recruited by a member of China’s Central Military Commission to develop a spy network in Taiwan. Tu lured active military officers to join his network, with the understanding that in the event of a war in the Taiwan Strait, they would adopt a passive stance of non-resistance.
The Supreme Court sentenced Tu to four years in prison in accordance with the National Security Act (國家安全法). Consequently, military authorities determined that Tu had lost the right to receive any further military pension payments and told him to repay what he had already received over the previous 12 years.
Apart from using financial means to lure Taiwanese businesspeople and companies, and infiltrating Taiwan’s political organizations and the media, the CCP’s infiltration of Taiwan’s military is getting more serious. In its attempts to bribe serving military personnel, the CCP often targets senior officers with the aim of disintegrating Taiwan’s armed forces from within.
The military “united front”-style infiltration is intended to diminish the power of Taiwan’s national defense, paving the way for unification by force of arms.
The Tu spying case highlights the methods that the CCP uses to infiltrate Taiwan.
As well as trying to bribe high-ranking officers in Taiwan’s armed forces, it also tries to brainwash them into being loyal to the CCP. Far from being an isolated case, it is part of the CCP’s psychological warfare strategy.
The methods are covert and insidious. As well as bribery, the strategy makes clever use of psychological warfare methods to manipulate people in Taiwan and disintegrate the national defense system from the inside.
A US think tank warned that the CCP might, before Taiwan’s next presidential election in 2028, adopt a four-stage strategy of “subjugation without fighting” that would involve gradually infiltrating and controlling Taiwan.
This includes increasing Taiwan’s economic dependence on China, infiltrating the political arena and media to influence the election, and exercising more direct control.
This step-by-step means of controlling Taiwan is meant to avoid triggering an armed conflict, but the ultimate goal is still to seize Taiwan.
Faced with such pervasive recruitment and threats from the CCP, Taiwan must be more vigilant. It must bolster its national defense, especially its military power, as well as its intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities, to identify and obstruct the CCP’s activities.
At the same time, it must build popular consensus, raise the public’s vigilance and improve people’s ability to resist temptation, in order to prevent the CCP’s “united front” strategy from succeeding.
Only through a comprehensive response can Taiwan ensure its security and sovereignty.
Chen Chun is an international affairs researcher.
Translated by Julian Clegg
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
Minister of National Defense Wellington Koo (顧立雄) has said that the armed forces must reach a high level of combat readiness by 2027. That date was not simply picked out of a hat. It has been bandied around since 2021, and was mentioned most recently by US Senator John Cornyn during a question to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio at a US Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on Tuesday. It first surfaced during a hearing in the US in 2021, when then-US Navy admiral Philip Davidson, who was head of the US Indo-Pacific Command, said: “The threat [of military
RSS