When I first walked in the streets of Taiwan during the New Year holidays, everything was closed and cities were silent. This quietness, perhaps a rare blessing, allowed me to explore the streets without the usual noise and agitation.
The red spring couplets on every door added a touch of warmth, communicating a festive spirit and allowing me to appreciate the beauty of the architecture and decorations in Taiwan, one of the first things I discovered after I arrived.
The streets are usually far from silent. Cities come alive with noise and color, especially at dusk, when the calming tones of shop signs compete with the bustle of rush hour. This chaotic beauty is a defining characteristic of Taiwanese cities.
Taiwanese houses can feel the same and appear very unique at the same time. They are vertical buildings, usually with two or three floors, with a covered passage in front — a practical feature for rainy days — that can also be used by restaurants and shops. I still do not really know how I feel about the massive quantity of air-conditioning units attached to every facade, but over time you get used to it and they do not appear as out of character.
Among the modern architectural residences, you can also still find traditional low houses made of red bricks. These buildings stand in stark contrast to their surroundings, seemingly resisting the modernity of its chaos and noise. They remind us of the importance of preserving cultural heritage amid rapid urban development.
Temples are a great place to observe this legacy, where you can admire every detail sculpted and find a calming ambiance accentuated by the incense fragrance.
What makes Taiwanese temples particularly captivating is their ability to bridge the gap between tradition and modernity.
Ancient and contemporary temples exist, blending ancient traditions with modern architecture. This characteristic blend makes them emblematic of Taiwanese architecture, presenting the island as a place where history and modernity coexist.
I find contemporary temples fascinating for multiple reasons. Their structures often imitate ancient designs while incorporating modern materials and amenities. From afar, they might look like ancient temples, but up close, the modern concrete and electric panels reveal their contemporary nature.
This multi-temporal architecture perfectly represents Taiwan as a place where history and modernity coexist.
These temples are also a result of cultural identity politics, religious revival and societal change. It showcases how Taiwanese architecture has been influenced. As Taiwan has strived to assert its distinct identity separate from China, temples have become key sites for expressing and reinforcing this uniqueness.
The architecture of Taiwan is a captivating blend of the old and the new, the traditional and the modern. It is chaotic yet beautiful, reflecting the island’s complex history and vibrant culture.
In the eyes of a foreigner, this architectural landscape is not only impressive, but also deeply representative of Taiwan’s unique identity.
Mila Guervilly is a student in the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS