When I first walked in the streets of Taiwan during the New Year holidays, everything was closed and cities were silent. This quietness, perhaps a rare blessing, allowed me to explore the streets without the usual noise and agitation.
The red spring couplets on every door added a touch of warmth, communicating a festive spirit and allowing me to appreciate the beauty of the architecture and decorations in Taiwan, one of the first things I discovered after I arrived.
The streets are usually far from silent. Cities come alive with noise and color, especially at dusk, when the calming tones of shop signs compete with the bustle of rush hour. This chaotic beauty is a defining characteristic of Taiwanese cities.
Taiwanese houses can feel the same and appear very unique at the same time. They are vertical buildings, usually with two or three floors, with a covered passage in front — a practical feature for rainy days — that can also be used by restaurants and shops. I still do not really know how I feel about the massive quantity of air-conditioning units attached to every facade, but over time you get used to it and they do not appear as out of character.
Among the modern architectural residences, you can also still find traditional low houses made of red bricks. These buildings stand in stark contrast to their surroundings, seemingly resisting the modernity of its chaos and noise. They remind us of the importance of preserving cultural heritage amid rapid urban development.
Temples are a great place to observe this legacy, where you can admire every detail sculpted and find a calming ambiance accentuated by the incense fragrance.
What makes Taiwanese temples particularly captivating is their ability to bridge the gap between tradition and modernity.
Ancient and contemporary temples exist, blending ancient traditions with modern architecture. This characteristic blend makes them emblematic of Taiwanese architecture, presenting the island as a place where history and modernity coexist.
I find contemporary temples fascinating for multiple reasons. Their structures often imitate ancient designs while incorporating modern materials and amenities. From afar, they might look like ancient temples, but up close, the modern concrete and electric panels reveal their contemporary nature.
This multi-temporal architecture perfectly represents Taiwan as a place where history and modernity coexist.
These temples are also a result of cultural identity politics, religious revival and societal change. It showcases how Taiwanese architecture has been influenced. As Taiwan has strived to assert its distinct identity separate from China, temples have become key sites for expressing and reinforcing this uniqueness.
The architecture of Taiwan is a captivating blend of the old and the new, the traditional and the modern. It is chaotic yet beautiful, reflecting the island’s complex history and vibrant culture.
In the eyes of a foreigner, this architectural landscape is not only impressive, but also deeply representative of Taiwan’s unique identity.
Mila Guervilly is a student in the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
China last week announced that it picked two Pakistani astronauts for its Tiangong space station mission, indicating the maturation of the two nations’ relationship from terrestrial infrastructure cooperation to extraterrestrial strategic domains. For Taiwan and India, the developments present an opportunity for democratic collaboration in space, particularly regarding dual-use technologies and the normative frameworks for outer space governance. Sino-Pakistani space cooperation dates back to the end of the Cold War in the 1990s, with a cooperative agreement between the Pakistani Space & Upper Atmosphere Research Commission, and the Chinese Ministry of Aerospace Industry. Space cooperation was integrated into the China-Pakistan