When I first walked in the streets of Taiwan during the New Year holidays, everything was closed and cities were silent. This quietness, perhaps a rare blessing, allowed me to explore the streets without the usual noise and agitation.
The red spring couplets on every door added a touch of warmth, communicating a festive spirit and allowing me to appreciate the beauty of the architecture and decorations in Taiwan, one of the first things I discovered after I arrived.
The streets are usually far from silent. Cities come alive with noise and color, especially at dusk, when the calming tones of shop signs compete with the bustle of rush hour. This chaotic beauty is a defining characteristic of Taiwanese cities.
Taiwanese houses can feel the same and appear very unique at the same time. They are vertical buildings, usually with two or three floors, with a covered passage in front — a practical feature for rainy days — that can also be used by restaurants and shops. I still do not really know how I feel about the massive quantity of air-conditioning units attached to every facade, but over time you get used to it and they do not appear as out of character.
Among the modern architectural residences, you can also still find traditional low houses made of red bricks. These buildings stand in stark contrast to their surroundings, seemingly resisting the modernity of its chaos and noise. They remind us of the importance of preserving cultural heritage amid rapid urban development.
Temples are a great place to observe this legacy, where you can admire every detail sculpted and find a calming ambiance accentuated by the incense fragrance.
What makes Taiwanese temples particularly captivating is their ability to bridge the gap between tradition and modernity.
Ancient and contemporary temples exist, blending ancient traditions with modern architecture. This characteristic blend makes them emblematic of Taiwanese architecture, presenting the island as a place where history and modernity coexist.
I find contemporary temples fascinating for multiple reasons. Their structures often imitate ancient designs while incorporating modern materials and amenities. From afar, they might look like ancient temples, but up close, the modern concrete and electric panels reveal their contemporary nature.
This multi-temporal architecture perfectly represents Taiwan as a place where history and modernity coexist.
These temples are also a result of cultural identity politics, religious revival and societal change. It showcases how Taiwanese architecture has been influenced. As Taiwan has strived to assert its distinct identity separate from China, temples have become key sites for expressing and reinforcing this uniqueness.
The architecture of Taiwan is a captivating blend of the old and the new, the traditional and the modern. It is chaotic yet beautiful, reflecting the island’s complex history and vibrant culture.
In the eyes of a foreigner, this architectural landscape is not only impressive, but also deeply representative of Taiwan’s unique identity.
Mila Guervilly is a student in the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS