Taiwan should step up its efforts to enact an artificial intelligence (AI) law to facilitate the adoption of the technology as rapid advancement in AI technology and the popularity of generative AI have raised serious concerns about misinformation, fake news and intellectual property infringements.
Taiwan is lagging major countries in offering legal guidance for using AI technology, although most discussions are still in the infancy stage. The government has been hesitant to regulate AI. In 2019, several lawmakers pushed for the creation of an AI law by proposing several drafts.
The government planned to roll out its own draft AI act by the end of last year. However, this did not happen, given the complexity and greater-than-expected challenges in finding a balance between enhancing development of technology and improving people’s lives, while avoiding unintended consequences.
Last week, the National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) disclosed some clues. By the end of October, a draft AI basic law would be put forward to the Cabinet, the council said. Encouraging technology innovation would be one of the principles in making the law. Besides, it would be human-oriented, NSTC Minister Wu Cheng-wen (吳誠文) told reporters. No further details were disclosed.
Compared with the government’s snail pace in providing a legislative basis for AI regulation, generative AI’s training and inferencing has doubled or tripled since it burst onto the scene in late 2022 amid an AI technology dominance race among the world’s technology giants including Nvidia Corp, AMD, Alphabet and OpenAI.
With the pace of technology advancement, people can easily access AI applications on their mobile phones, making AI their personal assistant by voice or text. Moreover, a wide range of industries, from medical care, transportation, banking, manufacturing to retail, have adopted AI technologies.
However, that also means that people are exposed to higher risks, as can be seen with surges in disinformation, scams and intellectual property infringements.
Some people are trying to prevent their voices and faces from being used in AI deepfakes after a slew of cases in which the voices of political leaders, actresses and singers were faked.
To minimize such risks, EU countries are to implement the world’s first AI act next month after the 27 countries of the economic bloc endorsed a deal last year. The rules aim to protect fundamental rights, democracy, the rule of law and environmental sustainability from high-risk AI, while boosting innovation, the EU said.
Compared with the EU’s comprehensive measures and mechanism, the NSTC has said that it intends to make AI rules a basic law by putting forward only guidelines for privacy protection, risk management and ethical principles.
With ample flexibility in regulating the adoption of AI, it would only benefit the technology’s development, but people’s rights can hardly be safeguarded.
To strike a balance, the government should work on more approaches to protect human rights and strengthen risk management, with an aim to block or reduce automated cyberattacks, AI-powered phishing attacks and deepfake scams. Intellectual property protection should also be considered.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS