Legislator’s document leak<\b>
There was a government document leak incident several years ago when I was working at a civil institution. There was a coworker on our team who was extremely diligent and circumspect about their duties.
One day when they were in the office, they suddenly had an emergency come up and inadvertently left a document with critical information where anyone could see.
The district prosecutors’ office later indicted my coworker, charging them with leaking national security secrets.
Fortunately, the judge on the case understood that this supposed criminal act was undoubtedly related to needing to rush off to an emergency, and was not an intentional act. The judge ultimately handed my coworker a lenient sentence.
In stark contrast, we have Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) publicly divulging contents from secret documents related to Ukraine. Hsu came straight out and intentionally revealed the payment methods and channels listed in the documents.
Not only did she damage the mutual trust between Taiwan and the Czech Republic, but she also unnecessarily made things more difficult for Taiwan’s assistance to Ukraine, even to the point of greatly lowering our national credibility in the eyes of other countries.
She is evidently a suspect in divulging secrets and intelligence. As a legislator, Hsu’s salary comes from the public purse. At the very least, she ought to be protecting classified documents.
If political power is used to intervene in judicial processes and she gets off scot-free, then what message does this send to civil servants on the bottom rungs who end up prosecuted for bona fide accidents? What an utter shame.
Yeh Yu-cheng,
Pingtung
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers