Taiwan will once again be forced to compete in the Olympics this summer under a nonsensical moniker that neither refers to any political reality nor the identity of its team.
Rather, Taiwan competes under “Chinese Taipei,” a Chinese construction imposed on Taiwanese without consultation.
“Chinese Taipei” is the sole Olympic team not reflecting the name used by its own people. Even territories such as Puerto Rico, Hong Kong and the Virgin Islands are allowed to use their own names and flags. Other partially recognized states such as Israel, Kosovo and Palestine compete as themselves.
“Chinese Taipei” includes athletes from Kaohsiung, Tainan, Kinmen and Penghu, many of whom reject the label “Chinese.” It is also a term which does not translate into Chinese.
The ambiguity of the Chinese translation has made room for an uneasy consensus in Taiwan, where just as many have reached accommodation with the Republic of China (ROC), Taiwan as a national identity, most Taiwanese have accepted this compromise as the price of participating in international sports, an argument that won out in Taiwan’s 2018 referendum.
“Chinese Taipei” has become how most of the world sees Taiwan, in effect allowing China to already conquer and subsume the nation in the global public consciousness. This was the goal of inventing “Chinese Taipei,” forcing the international community to accept the fiction that China has authority over Taiwan.
This psychological warfare, useless against Taiwanese, has done incalculable damage overseas. In the event of war, defending Taiwan would require great sacrifice from Americans and other allies. However, would Americans send their sons and daughters to fight for the survival of “Chinese Taipei?”
Would other allies? Would the international community protest against a seemingly internal Chinese fight? The layperson understands “Chinese Taipei” to imply a degree of Chinese control or sovereignty.
As China has grown more muscular, so has “Chinese Taipei creep,” the process by which China has forced the moniker beyond sports into arenas where Taiwan has long been known as Taiwan.
The WTO, which admitted Taiwan as the “Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu,” now refers to Taiwan as “Chinese Taipei,” as do other multilateral organizations such as APEC. This has even extended to bird-watching groups and beauty pageants.
When the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ruled the ROC on Taiwan under martial law, it was forced to participate in the Olympics as “Taiwan” and “Formosa,” despite the KMT’s claims to represent China. In response, the ROC team showed up to the 1960 Olympics with a giant banner reading “Under Protest.”
If Taiwan’s sporting committees lack the will to mount such a protest again, patriotic Taiwanese athletes should lead the way, continuing the long tradition of Olympic protest. Taiwanese athletes can unfurl flags, apply uniform patches and kneel for the national anthem to protest Taiwan’s discrimination by the International Olympic Committee (IOC).
International media must not submit to the fiction of “Chinese Taipei.” It is not a real place, and just because China insists that Taiwan’s team be mislabeled does not mean that newspapers and broadcasters should misinform their audiences. In the 2021, the New York Times identified Taiwan’s Olympic team as Taiwan, and NHK proclaimed “this is Taiwan” when “Chinese Taipei” entered the arena. Global media should follow suit by accurately reporting that Taiwan exists and explain the truth behind the false moniker.
Taiwan’s politically savvy diaspora can lead in holding overseas media accountable. In particular, Taiwanese Americans should leverage the language of social justice activism to hold US media to account for discriminating against Taiwanese. By framing their arguments in terms of racial justice, they have a vast arsenal to fight China’s propaganda.
In countries sympathetic to Taiwan’s cause, officials should encourage state broadcasters to tell the truth about Taiwan. The Czech Republic, Lithuania and the UK have all asserted rhetorical support for Taiwan, and have critical constituencies of politicians and policy experts who can play a leading role as watchdogs for how public broadcasters and national media depict Taiwan.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs should utilize strategies it has implemented for building support for World Health Assembly membership to build a global coalition to pressure the IOC to allow Taiwan to compete under its name of choice. The US and its allies must offer support.
The US Congress should pass the bipartisan Taiwan Allies Fund Act and direct funds to support allies who face economic repercussions from China for upholding press freedoms.
Taiwan has a lot to do in sharing its story and unique history with the world, but it must start by speaking its name.
Sasha B. Chhabra is an analyst, commentator and media consultant on China’s foreign policy, Taiwanese politics and cross-strait affairs.
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
RSS