In today’s interconnected world, young Taiwanese are increasingly looking beyond the confines of their island nation to gain enriching life experiences overseas and boost their career trajectories.
Working holidays have become attractive for those seeking to combine travel with meaningful employment, offering unique opportunities for cultural immersion and professional development. This reflects broader trends in youth mobility, driven by the desire to navigate a rapidly globalizing world more effectively.
Working holidays present a dual opportunity, allowing young people to travel and explore new cultures while gaining work experience that is often highly valued at home. For many young Taiwanese, these programs provide a practical solution to the quandary of wanting to travel, but needing to maintain career progression. The ability to live in a foreign country, learn a new language and develop a global network is facilitated and augmented by the ability to earn money, which funds their travels.
The primary motivation is to enhance their career prospects. Global exposure gained through such experiences is invaluable, providing insights into diverse business practices and workplace cultures. It is a differentiator in a competitive job market where employers increasingly value international experience and adaptability.
Working holidays also offer a platform for profound personal growth. Immersing oneself in an entirely different culture fosters adaptability, open-mindedness and resilience. These soft skills are crucial in personal development and are highly transferable to professional environments.
Participants can not only share their own culture, but also learn to appreciate and respect the nuances of others. This cultural exchange nurtures global citizens more equipped to operate in multicultural settings.
However, working holidays come with their own set of challenges. The initial costs of visas, flights and setting up in a new country can be daunting without adequate savings or financial support. Moreover, while some programs offer a stipend or salary, these might not always cover living expenses, particularly in expensive areas.
Culture shock and homesickness are common experiences. The difference in workplace etiquette, communication styles and daily life can be overwhelming without proper preparation and support.
For Taiwan, this trend can enhance its global connectivity and cultural footprint. Recognizing the value of these programs, policymakers could develop more robust frameworks to support potential participants. This could include partnerships with host countries, financial grants and predeparture training programs that prepare young people for overseas experience.
Institutions and governments have the opportunity to harness this potential by facilitating smoother pathways for young adventurers seeking global horizons.
As more young people embark on these journeys, the fabric of Taiwanese society becomes increasingly woven with diverse global threads. This demonstrates the importance of supporting such ventures for a future-ready Taiwan.
Tseng Chu-ching is a student in the Department of International Affairs at Wenzao Ursuline University of Languages.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS