Since former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) so-called “trip of peace” to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) last month, Beijing has ramped up, and expanded the domain of its coercive operations toward Taiwan.
Despite Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Fu Kun-chi leading 16 other lawmakers on a so-called “peace thawing” delegation to Beijing last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army has continued its military incursions, including crossing the median line of the Taiwan Strait.
On May 1, National Security Bureau Director-General Tsai Ming-yen (蔡明彥) told lawmakers that Beijing has incorporated new tactics into its joint combat-readiness patrols near Taiwan, including using a more sophisticated mixture of aircraft and ships, and staging nighttime combat patrols.
It is clear that the KMT’s so-called peace meetings are providing Beijing with the cover to ramp up its coercion of Taiwan.
It was therefore timely that Washington-based think tank the American Enterprise Institute released a report this week titled From Coercion to Capitulation: How China Can Take Taiwan Without a War.
The report warned US policymakers that they have been too focused on preparing for and deterring a military conflict with China and neglecting “the likelier scenario” which is a “coercion campaign that remains far short of invasion, but nevertheless brings Taiwan under Beijing’s control.”
“A plausible pathway exists for the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to employ coercion on a mass scale to force the Republic of China government to accept Beijing’s demands without sparking a large regional war,” the report says, adding that Beijing’s “comprehensive political-military campaign” short of war attacks four centers of gravity:
First is the US-Taiwan relationship. Through the use of information warfare and military threats, Beijing seeks to convince Taiwanese that Taiwan-US cooperation only precipitates further military escalation.
Second is Taipei’s ability to function competently. Through economic warfare, cyberwarfare and sabotage, Beijing seeks to undermine Taiwanese confidence in their government to secure their security and prosperity.
Third is Taiwanese willpower. The report says Beijing is using extensive and persistent cognitive and psychological campaigns “to break the Taiwanese public’s will to resist.”
Fourth is the US public, against which Beijing uses widespread information campaigns aimed at decreasing willingness to support Taiwan.
The report says that if Beijing successfully assaults each of these centers of gravity, “the sense of abandonment among the Taiwanese people would be overwhelming, and the Republic of China government would be forced to consider a new paradigm for cross-Strait relations as an alternative to further pain and suffering.”
Critics of the report would say that it overestimates the effect that punishment-based coercion can have on a civilians. As Robert Pape showed in his seminal Bombing to Win: Air Power and Coercion, coercive actions often do not have their intended effect, but tend to harden a population’s resolve.
However, what this criticism misses is Beijing’s strategy might not simply be immediate unification. Rather, it is to shape the political conditions so that Taiwanese vote for a government that would implement a string of accommodationist policies, while distancing Taiwan from the US.
The KMT is key to Beijing’s calculus. If it was serious about its so-called “nuanced” diplomacy, it would vocally and credibly demand that Beijing desist from its coercion. It does not, which shows that the party’s interest is not in protecting Taiwan, but in working with Beijing to shape Taiwanese perceptions.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises