The most powerful dictator in the world, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), is visiting Europe, making three stops.
China’s objective for Europe is clear: Ensure that Europe would not put up strong resistance in the form of EU sectoral sanctions to Chinese hostilities against democracies in East Asia, such as Taiwan, Japan or the Philippines. French, Hungarian and Serbian leaders would be helping him out, because of their questionable strategies, local corruption needs and general ignorance of global security. Despite European economic and political stability depending on peace in the Taiwan Strait, many European leaders are doing nothing to deter China’s aggression and are instead feeding the Chinese war machine.
Driven by anti-Americanism, a hurt ego as a former superpower, a naive appeasement strategy and the greed of several French companies, French President Emmanuel Macron would again kneel to the Chinese president. He would make a few nice speeches about principles, but instead of pressuring China with EU sectoral sanctions to force it to stop its support of the Russian war, he would cheer another set of dirty money contracts. This would deepen European economic dependence on the will of the Chinese Communist Party instead of decreasing it, which is the EU policy of de-risking.
Macron might again throw other democracies under the bus to please Xi and damage the transatlantic alliance even more, like he did after his last trip to Beijing. As an example, France is happy to sell military-use helicopters to China, which can be used to transport Chinese solders to butcher Taiwanese defenders, the scenario Beijing is systematically preparing for.
France knows about the Chinese war build-up and still signs large contracts boosting Chinese military capabilities. It is no surprise that France is actively sabotaging NATO efforts to cooperate with Japan, a regional democratic leader in the Indo-Pacific and a natural ally of Europe.
Why is Macron doing it? There are only two options: Either it is a part of his dirty deal with the Chinese president (France blocks NATO cooperation with Japan in exchange for Chinese contracts for French companies) or it is just pure appeasement — a failed strategy France did on Russia for years until it completely collapsed and enabled the Russian war in Ukraine, since Moscow interpreted it as European weakness.
In Serbia, President Aleksandar Vucic, a known puppet of Russia, would be asking for more dirty Chinese money. He is happy to sell out Serbian sovereignty by allowing more Chinese police (effectively Chinese intelligence) into Serbia to give them an entry point to Europe. Serbia already serves as a Russian and Chinese intelligence base against other Balkan states, so Vucic would just be re-kissing the ring of Xi. With Serbia having no real chance of getting into EU or NATO, its usefulness for Chinese geopolitical plans is limited.
Loyal Russian servant Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban is the best ally of Chinese communists in Europe, already speaking and voting on their behalf in the EU. Hungary serves as a Russian and Chinese intelligence base for wider Central Europe. It hosts many Chinese espionage cover organizations, such as a branch of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (led by a senior China-affiliated spy) and the largest Huawei research and development branch outside China. Orban would happily allow more Chinese police (meaning Chinese intelligence) inside this NATO member state and beg for more dirty money contracts for the Belgrade-Budapest railway to fund oligarchs and proxies.
Jakub Janda is the Director of European Values Center for Security, headquartered in Prague. It is so far the only European think tank with a permanent office in Taiwan.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS