The senior-high school section of Chung Cheng Armed Forces Preparatory School has registered 580 cadets out of 900 applicants, a three-year high.
The numbers show that willingness to serve in the military has not been affected by pension reform. They also shatter the lie that Chinese Communist Party (CCP) saber-rattling affects willingness to serve among Taiwanese.
A former director of National Defense University’s Fu Hsing Kang College who became an instructor following several years of military service applied for retirement at age 47 and began receiving his lifetime pension.
In addition to a monthly stipend of about NT$60,000, he continues to work, having entered the tourism industry. Many of his coworkers are amazed at his double income.
His example shows that most service members have a guaranteed livelihood after retiring, which is nothing like what some rumor-happy people have said about severe effects on one’s livelihood leading to a poor quality of life.
Good treatment of and benefits for veterans seem to have been factors for many applicants taking the preparatory school’s placement exams.
As for the CCP’s threats to use military force against Taiwan, some people in social discourse are trying to convince others that bravery and willingness to serve would take a hit among most people.
After all, nobody who serves in any country’s military is particularly keen about the prospect of war, and the threat to life and limb.
However, if the CCP launches a war, all Taiwanese would need to face this trial. It would be unavoidable for everyone.
If everyone has the resolve to face a national crisis together, and show determination to resist and fight back, it would be a blow to the CCP’s ambitions for Taiwan.
That so many fresh graduates of junior-high schools are willing to apply to the preparatory school — the nation’s base institution for the cultivation of officers and the core of the military — clearly shows that the younger generation is not only willing to fight back against aggressors, but is also willing to bear the burden of protecting home and country.
Chen Chi-nung is a former specialist training instructor at Cheng Kung Lin Base.
Translated by Tim Smith
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
As Ukraine leads the global fight for democracy, Taiwan, facing a potential war with China, should draw lessons from Ukraine’s cyberwarfare success. Taiwan has been enhancing its arsenal with advanced weapons from the West in anticipation of a possible full-scale invasion. However, Taipei should also consider Ukraine’s effective digital warfare, notably the “IT [information technology] Army,” a decentralized force instrumental in Kyiv’s cybercampaigns. In February 2022, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine marked the onset of a significant cyberwar, where fears of a “digital Pearl Harbor” in Ukraine were unmet, thanks to robust cyberdefenses backed by Western public and private support. This led
Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is attempting to create an alternative international world order to the US-dominated model. China has benefited hugely from the current order since former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平) opened up its economy five decades ago. Countries can be categorized as continental or maritime, and to a great degree this determines their optimum foreign policy. China is continental, as is Russia. The US initially followed a continental foreign policy, before it settled on a maritime model. The British empire was so successful because a tiny island kingdom built a formidable naval presence. The US-dominated world order, stabilized by
With the addition this year of Sweden and last year Finland to NATO, the Baltic Sea has been dubbed a “NATO lake” by some analysts. A glance at a map shows that is largely (but not completely) true — the coastline has a couple of slivers of Russian territory. The rest of the coastal littoral is in NATO hands: Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Germany and Denmark. Russia controls a bit of coast between Lithuania and Poland because of its strange enclave of Kaliningrad. Russian President Vladimir Putin remains in control of the far eastern corner of the Baltic Sea