On Tuesday last week, the US Senate Committee on Foreign Relations unanimously passed the Promoting a Resolution to the Tibet-China Dispute Act, also known as the Resolve Tibet bill. The US House of Representatives had passed the resolution on Feb. 15. The next stage is for it to be reviewed in the US Senate. Given the high level of support it received in the foreign relations committee, there is a strong chance of it being passed and signed into law.
The bill calls for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respect the rights to freedom and self-
determination of Tibetans, and to enter into negotiations with the Dalai Lama for a peaceful resolution of the Tibetan issue. It also says Tibet includes the Tibet Autonomous Region and areas inhabited by Tibetans, including Gansu, Qinghai, Sichuan and Yunnan provinces, and calls on the CCP to stop spreading disinformation about Tibet and its history.
The bill seeks to encourage the CCP to resolve the Tibet issue in accordance with international law.
No one knows whether the bill would be signed into US law. However, if it is, the CCP is almost certain to react with indignation and anger, and it would warn the US not to interfere in China’s domestic affairs, and that it was “playing with fire.”
One might say that this is a reasonable reaction, except that all the bill seeks to do is to ensure that a peaceful resolution is sought in a genuine way, unclouded by untruths and historical distortions, and in accordance with international convention and law. Yet that is not the CCP’s way.
On this page, Khedroob Thondup, a former member of the Tibetan parliament in exile, writes about the implications of the passage of this bill into law for Tibetans, and for the potential resolution of tensions between India and China.
India is now dealing with the untruths and historical distortions propagated by the CCP regarding the border region that Beijing insists has always been part of China’s territory, and which it now calls Zangnan, or “South Tibet.”
The Philippines is also dealing with the CCP’s untruths and historical distortions about claims over the South China Sea.
On the Taiwan issue, the US is continuously trying to push back on the CCP’s untruths and historical distortions about UN Resolution 2758 and the definition of the US’ “one China policy” as opposed to the CCP’s “one China principle.”
The CCP will focus on its insistence that Tibet is a domestic issue, as it believes its claims over the South China Sea and over Taiwan to be.
However, that is not the point of the Resolve Tibet bill. The bill’s simple aim is that the issue be resolved in accordance with historical veracity and international law, and with respect for people’s right to self-determination.
This is why the CCP will rebuff the encouragement called for in the Resolve Tibet bill. The CCP has no interest in history or international law or the rights of people unless these things serve its own interests. They are merely tools to achieve an end, and the final arbiter is where the power lies.
Tibet has no power without the support of the international community and a recognition of the injustice of its predicament. Taiwan is in the same position, although the free world is waking up to the fact that Taiwan has long been subjected to the CCP’s position that power makes right.
The Tibetans welcome the impetus that led to the proposal of the Resolve Tibet bill. So will India. And so should all Taiwanese.
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
RSS