KMT needs to rethink its role
A few days ago, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), along with other lawmakers, submitted a bill to amend the Budget Act (預算法). The proposal would require special budgets put forth by the executive branch to undergo legislative approval, while removing several provisions in the act. If an emergency occurred, nothing could be done to directly push through a special budget.
Were Hsu’s amendment to pass, Hualien County, struck by a massive earthquake on April 3 — the constituency most severely affected by the temblor, represented by KMT caucus convener and former Hualien County commissioner Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) — and other potential disaster zones would be unable to access immediate response funds and resources.
The KMT lawmakers in this legislative session have proposed several constitutionally debilitating and chaos-inducing bills in the name of “legislative reform.”
They are incapable of picking up on the public pulse.
The Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation’s latest political party survey showed that KMT support is dropping, falling to about 10 percent below that of the Democratic Progressive Party. Last month’s My-Formosa.com poll showed that satisfaction with the KMT had fallen the most, whereas dissatisfaction with the party had risen the most.
It goes to show that the KMT — the largest opposition party — has since the beginning of the new legislative session on Feb. 1 put nothing forth except a series of offbeat, hubris-fueled bills. The KMT’s absurd political behavior is a slap in the face of public opinion.
It is a given that Taiwan’s opposition parties should serve as a check on the governing party, but acting in a supervisory capacity should be based on helping Taiwan’s national development. The KMT should not give the public the impression that it exists only to be a troublemaker. From the KMT chairman downward, each tier of its public officials and even supporters ought to take note of public sentiment and fight to advance Taiwan’s interests.
The KMT should pay no heed to Chinese Communist Party directives, which make it appear as if it is helping China to annex Taiwan.
If not, the KMT would be walking a thorny path if it wishes to gain a majority in the central government.
Chiu Ping-chin
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS