KMT needs to rethink its role
A few days ago, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Hsu Hsin-ying (徐欣瑩), along with other lawmakers, submitted a bill to amend the Budget Act (預算法). The proposal would require special budgets put forth by the executive branch to undergo legislative approval, while removing several provisions in the act. If an emergency occurred, nothing could be done to directly push through a special budget.
Were Hsu’s amendment to pass, Hualien County, struck by a massive earthquake on April 3 — the constituency most severely affected by the temblor, represented by KMT caucus convener and former Hualien County commissioner Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) — and other potential disaster zones would be unable to access immediate response funds and resources.
The KMT lawmakers in this legislative session have proposed several constitutionally debilitating and chaos-inducing bills in the name of “legislative reform.”
They are incapable of picking up on the public pulse.
The Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation’s latest political party survey showed that KMT support is dropping, falling to about 10 percent below that of the Democratic Progressive Party. Last month’s My-Formosa.com poll showed that satisfaction with the KMT had fallen the most, whereas dissatisfaction with the party had risen the most.
It goes to show that the KMT — the largest opposition party — has since the beginning of the new legislative session on Feb. 1 put nothing forth except a series of offbeat, hubris-fueled bills. The KMT’s absurd political behavior is a slap in the face of public opinion.
It is a given that Taiwan’s opposition parties should serve as a check on the governing party, but acting in a supervisory capacity should be based on helping Taiwan’s national development. The KMT should not give the public the impression that it exists only to be a troublemaker. From the KMT chairman downward, each tier of its public officials and even supporters ought to take note of public sentiment and fight to advance Taiwan’s interests.
The KMT should pay no heed to Chinese Communist Party directives, which make it appear as if it is helping China to annex Taiwan.
If not, the KMT would be walking a thorny path if it wishes to gain a majority in the central government.
Chiu Ping-chin
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS