Concern that the Great Barrier Reef might be experiencing the most severe mass coral bleaching event on record has escalated after a conservation group released footage showing damage up to 18m below the surface.
Selina Ward, a marine biologist and former academic director of the University of Queensland’s Heron Island Research Station, said it was the worst bleaching she had seen in 30 years working on the reef, and that some coral was starting to die.
The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority earlier this month said that aerial surveys of more than 1,000 individual reefs revealed more than half were rated as having high or very high levels of bleaching, and a smaller number in the south — less than 10 percent of the total — had extreme bleaching. Only about a quarter were relatively unaffected.
Illustration: Yusha
It confirmed the 2,300km reef system was experiencing its fifth mass bleaching event in eight years. The authority said sea surface temperatures had been between 0.5°C and 1.5°C hotter than expected for this time of year.
The Australian Marine Conservation Society on Thursday last week released video and photos that it said showed bleaching on the southern part of the reef extended to greater depths than had been previously reported this year.
Ward said the impact of bleaching had been extensive across 16 sites that she visited in the reef’s southern section, affecting coral species that had usually been resistant to bleaching. Some coral had started to die, a process that usually takes weeks or months after bleaching occurs.
“I feel devastated,” she said. “I’ve been working on the reef since 1992 but this [event], I’m really struggling with.”
Coral bleaching describes a process where the coral animal expels the algae that live in their tissues and give them their color and much of their nutrients.
Without their algae, a coral’s white skeleton can be seen through their translucent flesh, giving a bleached appearance.
Mass coral bleaching over large areas, first noticed in the 1980s around the Caribbean, is caused by rising ocean temperatures.
Some corals also display fluorescent colors under stress when they release a pigment that filters light. Sunlight also plays a role in triggering bleaching.
Corals can survive bleaching if temperatures are not too extreme or prolonged, but extreme marine heatwaves could kill corals outright.
Coral bleaching can also have sub-lethal effects, including increased susceptibility to disease and reduced rates of growth and reproduction.
Scientists say the gaps between bleaching events are becoming too short to allow reefs to recover.
Coral reefs are considered one of the planet’s ecosystems most at risk from global heating. Reefs support fisheries that feed hundreds of millions of people, as well as supporting major tourism industries.
The world’s biggest coral reef system — Australia’s Great Barrier Reef — has suffered seven mass bleaching events since 1998, of which five were in the past decade.
Ward said sea temperatures at two of the sites she visited were the same at the surface and 20m below the surface. This was “very unusual,” and reinforced the need for rapid action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, she said.
“What are we doing to stop the reef from being lost?” Ward said. “We cannot expect to save the Great Barrier Reef and be opening new fossil fuel developments. It is time to act and there are no more excuses.”
Coral bleaching occurs when the coral becomes heat-stressed and ejects the tiny marine algae, known as zooxanthellae, that live in its tissue and give most of its color and energy. With the zooxanthellae gone, the coral starves and its bone-white calcium skeleton becomes visible.
If the elevated temperature does not last long, the coral can recover. Otherwise, it starts to die. In the most severe cases, the bleaching is skipped and the coral dies almost immediately, usually turning a dirty brown.
Terry Hughes, an emeritus professor at James Cook University and longtime reef bleaching researcher, said the aerial surveys showed “the most widespread and most severe mass bleaching and mortality event ever recorded on the Great Barrier Reef.”
He said the scale of the damage was comparable to 2016, the worst previous year experienced, but there were now fewer individual reefs untouched by bleaching between southern Queensland and the Torres Strait. He said the area south of Townsville had been particularly badly hit this year.
“We are already seeing extensive loss of corals at the time of peak bleaching,” he said. “It is heartbreaking to see damage as severe as this as soon as this.”
Hughes said every part of the reef system had now bleached at least once since 1998. Some reefs had bleached three or four times. He said the cumulative damage made it harder for reefs to recover and more likely they would succumb.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change in 2018 found that most tropical coral reefs would be lost if global heating was limited to an average of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and 99 percent were likely to be lost if heating reached 2°C. They found they would be at high risk at 1.2°C, a level that might have already been reached.
Australian Marine Conservation Society reef campaign manager Lissa Schindler called on the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority to release maps showing the extent and severity of the bleaching so the public had a true picture of the scale of the impact.
Schindler also urged the authority, which she described as the reef’s custodian, to play a greater role in advocating for stronger action on emissions.
She said in the past the authority had called for “strong and fast national action” to deal with the climate crisis, but a more recent climate statement it issued focused on global action and did not say anything about Australia needing to increase what it was doing.
“If the [Austrlian Prime Minister Anthony] Albanese government is serious about its commitment to UNESCO to protect the reef then it must commit to net zero emissions by 2035 and stop approving new fossil fuel projects,” she said.
Scientists have said the government’s emissions reduction targets — a 43 percent cut compared with 2005 levels and net zero by 2050 — are consistent with global action that could lead to 2°C of global heating.
Interviewed on Australian Broadcast Corp’s Radio National on Wednesday, Australian Minister for the Environment and Water Tanya Plibersek said the government was “very concerned about the bleaching that we see at the moment, sadly, not just on the Great Barrier Reef, but right around the world.”
She said the government was doing “whatever we can” to get to net zero emissions. “We need to protect the reef because it is… unique in the world and also 64,000 people rely on it for their work,” she said.
A reef authority spokesperson said it confirmed early last month that widespread coral bleaching was unfolding. They said in-water coral surveys were continuing and a report including data and maps would be published “in the coming weeks.”
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS