This year marks the 30th anniversary of the “410 Demonstration for Education Reform” march on April 10, 1994.
As a junior-high school teacher, I have had the chance to experience the major changes during the education reform. In all fairness, there have been gains and losses in education over the past 30 years.
Generally, for the pros: The content of Taiwan’s education has become more diverse, the school atmosphere has become friendlier and school management has become more open and participatory. Even though the challenges for teachers and the burden on students have increased, technology has now opened up channels for learning and the ability of students to learn on their own has greatly influenced their learning achievements.
For the cons, the general elevation in academic qualifications has not been accompanied by a simultaneous improvement in the quality of learning.
The education reform in Taiwan has abandoned the traditional academic culture of “credentialism” in the past, while opening the door for students to pursue a variety of technical, athletic and technological skills.
Apart from studying, many students have found their own goals in life, and the campus is no longer just an environment for studying, but also a place where students can discover various learning opportunities by themselves.
With an emphasis on human rights, every student is treated with respect in school today. As society pays greater attention to the protection of students’ rights in general, teachers’ discipline methods become an issue of public concern.
Under such circumstances, the campus atmosphere has become more harmonious and friendlier, and more civil groups can participate in the education system to jointly protect the next generation, so they can grow up healthily.
In addition, the advocacy of teachers’ rights has led to a qualitative reform in school management, changing the “top-down” hierarchical structure of the past, replacing orders with communication and cooperation with individualism. Teachers have a greater sense of participation and students have a greater sense of recognition about school affairs, as they work together to make contributions mentally and physically to the development of schools.
Plus, the advancement of technology has brought about changes in learning styles.
On one hand, teachers use technology to assist instruction. On the other, despite that technology makes teaching more effective and faster, it also widens the gap among students’ learning achievements.
While technology allows for autonomous learning, it is still necessary to rely on students’ motivation, and they should make good use of technology to enhance academic performance. As for students who are addicted to computers, they might lose their motivation to learn once they “get lost on the Internet.”
There are voices in society blaming the “410 Demonstration for Education Reform” for the excessive establishment of senior high schools and universities across Taiwan. However, how could the current problem of school closure caused by the drastic decrease in the country’s population have possibly been foreseen at that time?
What we should review is that, when establishing senior high schools and universities, the reformists should have thought about how to control the quality of education and not devalue diplomas, which is where the problems lie.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of Shuili Junior High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS