Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) announced on Saturday last week that the city government would push for more comprehensive urban renewal policies after inspecting a damaged housing complex.
The average age of buildings in Taiwan is nearly 40 years, and 72 percent are 30 years old or older, he said, adding that earthquakes come with no warning, so the city government would vigorously promote urban renewal.
Separately, Premier Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) on Monday said that the rebuilding of old and unsafe buildings in Taiwan is especially important due to the frequency of earthquakes.
Urban renewal in Taiwan has been a focus of politicians and a subject of controversy for more than a decade. In 2011, then-Democratic Progressive Party chairwoman and presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) promised to tackle the issue on a large scale if elected.
In 2012, then-Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) pushed through the reconstruction of an apartment complex in the city’s Shilin District (士林), despite protests from 5 percent of the site’s property owners.
Protests have delayed or prevented urban renewal projects in the past, even when the majority of residents have agreed to reconstruction. Amendments to the Urban Renewal Act (都市更新條例) passed in 2018 sought to tackle such delays by having disputes resolved by municipal urban planning committees and urban design review committees, then hearings, in that order.
One amendment raised the quorum for a project to be initiated from one-tenth of all affected property owners to half of all proprietors before a renewal plan can be delivered to local authorities for approval.
However, if at least 90 percent of proprietors agree to a project, the plan might be implemented.
Since those amendments, along with others, were passed in 2019, more than 4,000 renewal projects have been approved and completed, Chen said. However, a report published by the Taipei Times on Dec. 19, 2022, cited tax registration certificates showing that there are about 928,000 buildings in Taipei.
With fewer than 1 percent of Taipei’s buildings having been reconstructed following those amendments, and the average age of buildings in the city being 40 years old, urban renewal efforts are moving at a snail’s pace.
Local Chinese-language media in September last year cited statistics from Taipei’s Public Works Bureau as showing that up to 21 percent of the city is highly vulnerable to liquefaction.
Sinkholes have also occurred at various construction sites throughout the city over the past year, with one at a site on a street in Dazhi, Zhongshan District (中山), managed by Kee Tai Properties causing surrounding buildings to sink.
Given the instability of the soil in many parts of Taipei, and the unpredictability of earthquakes, urban renewal is a particularly urgent matter.
Since renewal projects are unlikely to be delayed by holdouts, the government should begin diverting more resources toward these. Aside from safety considerations, there is another reason for prioritizing building reconstruction: Taipei’s aging population.
As Chiang has said, Taipei’s buildings — like its people — are getting old. The time for urban renewal is now.
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
On Monday last week, American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) Director Raymond Greene met with Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers to discuss Taiwan-US defense cooperation, on the heels of a separate meeting the previous week with Minister of National Defense Minister Wellington Koo (顧立雄). Departing from the usual convention of not advertising interactions with senior national security officials, the AIT posted photos of both meetings on Facebook, seemingly putting the ruling and opposition parties on public notice to obtain bipartisan support for Taiwan’s defense budget and other initiatives. Over the past year, increasing Taiwan’s defense budget has been a sore spot
Media said that several pan-blue figures — among them former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱), former KMT legislator Lee De-wei (李德維), former KMT Central Committee member Vincent Hsu (徐正文), New Party Chairman Wu Cheng-tien (吳成典), former New Party legislator Chou chuan (周荃) and New Party Deputy Secretary-General You Chih-pin (游智彬) — yesterday attended the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) military parade commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. China’s Xinhua news agency reported that foreign leaders were present alongside Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), such as Russian President Vladimir Putin, North Korean leader Kim