Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) announced on Saturday last week that the city government would push for more comprehensive urban renewal policies after inspecting a damaged housing complex.
The average age of buildings in Taiwan is nearly 40 years, and 72 percent are 30 years old or older, he said, adding that earthquakes come with no warning, so the city government would vigorously promote urban renewal.
Separately, Premier Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁) on Monday said that the rebuilding of old and unsafe buildings in Taiwan is especially important due to the frequency of earthquakes.
Urban renewal in Taiwan has been a focus of politicians and a subject of controversy for more than a decade. In 2011, then-Democratic Progressive Party chairwoman and presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) promised to tackle the issue on a large scale if elected.
In 2012, then-Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌) pushed through the reconstruction of an apartment complex in the city’s Shilin District (士林), despite protests from 5 percent of the site’s property owners.
Protests have delayed or prevented urban renewal projects in the past, even when the majority of residents have agreed to reconstruction. Amendments to the Urban Renewal Act (都市更新條例) passed in 2018 sought to tackle such delays by having disputes resolved by municipal urban planning committees and urban design review committees, then hearings, in that order.
One amendment raised the quorum for a project to be initiated from one-tenth of all affected property owners to half of all proprietors before a renewal plan can be delivered to local authorities for approval.
However, if at least 90 percent of proprietors agree to a project, the plan might be implemented.
Since those amendments, along with others, were passed in 2019, more than 4,000 renewal projects have been approved and completed, Chen said. However, a report published by the Taipei Times on Dec. 19, 2022, cited tax registration certificates showing that there are about 928,000 buildings in Taipei.
With fewer than 1 percent of Taipei’s buildings having been reconstructed following those amendments, and the average age of buildings in the city being 40 years old, urban renewal efforts are moving at a snail’s pace.
Local Chinese-language media in September last year cited statistics from Taipei’s Public Works Bureau as showing that up to 21 percent of the city is highly vulnerable to liquefaction.
Sinkholes have also occurred at various construction sites throughout the city over the past year, with one at a site on a street in Dazhi, Zhongshan District (中山), managed by Kee Tai Properties causing surrounding buildings to sink.
Given the instability of the soil in many parts of Taipei, and the unpredictability of earthquakes, urban renewal is a particularly urgent matter.
Since renewal projects are unlikely to be delayed by holdouts, the government should begin diverting more resources toward these. Aside from safety considerations, there is another reason for prioritizing building reconstruction: Taipei’s aging population.
As Chiang has said, Taipei’s buildings — like its people — are getting old. The time for urban renewal is now.
The Cabinet on Nov. 6 approved a NT$10 billion (US$318.4 million) four-year plan to build tourism infrastructure in mountainous areas and the south. Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) on Tuesday announced that the Ministry of Transportation and Communications would offer weekday accommodation discounts, birthday specials and other domestic travel incentives beginning next March, aiming to encourage more travel outside the usual weekend and holiday peaks. The government is right to focus on domestic tourism. Although the data appear encouraging on the surface — as total domestic trips are up compared with their pre-COVID-19 pandemic numbers — a closer look tells a different
For more than seven decades, the Chinese Communist Party has claimed to govern Tibet with benevolence and progress. I have seen the truth behind the slogans. I have listened to the silences of monks forbidden to speak of the Dalai Lama, watched the erosion of our language in classrooms, and felt the quiet grief of a people whose prayers are monitored and whose culture is treated as a threat. That is why I will only accept complete independence for Tibet. The so-called “autonomous region” is autonomous in name only. Decisions about religion, education and cultural preservation are made in Beijing, not
Apart from the first arms sales approval for Taiwan since US President Donald Trump took office, last month also witnessed another milestone for Taiwan-US relations. Trump signed the Taiwan Assurance Implementation Act into law on Tuesday. Its passing without objection in the US Senate underscores how bipartisan US support for Taiwan has evolved. The new law would further help normalize exchanges between Taiwanese and US government officials. We have already seen a flurry of visits to Washington earlier this summer, not only with Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍), but also delegations led by National Security Council Secretary-General Joseph Wu
I recently watched a panel discussion on Taiwan Talks in which the host rightly asked a critical question: Why is the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC) spearheading a robust global movement to reject China’s ongoing distortion of UN Resolution 2758? While the discussion offered some context, a more penetrating analysis and urgent development was missed. The IPAC action is not merely a political gesture; it is an essential legal and diplomatic countermeasure to China’s escalating and fundamentally baseless campaign to manufacture a claim over Taiwan through the deliberate misinterpretation of a 1971 UN resolution. Since the inauguration of Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) as
RSS