Quake thanks games
Following the earthquake, which measured a 7.2 on the Richter scale, that struck Hualien County on Wednesday morning last week, leaders of at least 48 countries and other important politicians expressed their condolences to Taiwan and offered to provide assistance.
Meanwhile, Chinese Deputy Permanent Representative to the UN Geng Shuang (耿爽), tagged on a remark thanking the international community “on Taiwan’s behalf” for its care and good wishes, during a UN Security Council briefing.
Geng’s statement was sternly condemned by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which accused China of shamelessly using the earthquake to engage in cognitive warfare.
After reading news reports about the incident, I was fuming, but I felt a bit better after reading a post by a Japanese user named Koji Hirai on the social platform X.
Following the earthquake in “the independent country of Taiwan,” a Chinese representative had thanked the international community for its concern on Taiwan’s behalf, Hirai wrote.
The Chinese representative seemed to be losing his marbles, he said, adding that Taiwan is an independent country, so China’s action was as if an earthquake happened in Hawaii and Japan’s representative spoke on behalf of the US government by thanking other countries for their concern.
Some self-styled “constitutional experts” in Taiwan say that, according to the Constitution of the Republic of China, the “Taiwan area” and the “mainland area” both belong to the territory of the Republic of China.
In that case, if there is an earthquake in the “mainland area” (which, of course, we hope would not happen) and the international community provides assistance or donations, the “constitutional experts” should follow Geng’s example by expressing gratitude on behalf of the people of the “mainland area” of the Republic of China.
That would make sense, would it not?
Chuang Po-wen
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS