Technologists have been doing it. Jamie Dimon just did it in his latest letter to shareholders. I am referring to the way people are comparing the transformational impact of artificial intelligence (AI) to that of the steam engine. The metaphor has not only become a cliche; it paints an oversimplified and too-rosy picture of how this technology would reshape our lives.
To be fair to Dimon, the CEO of JPMorgan Chase & Co, his examples were drawn from a wider net: “Think the printing press, the steam engine, electricity, computing and the Internet, among others,” he wrote. However, the effects of perfecting steam power pale in comparison with the changes that the next technological development would bring.
It is easy to understand why so many have reached for the comparison.
It was the closest metaphor “to help understand what AI means for humanity,” Microsoft Corp chief technology officer Kevin Scott said at a recent conference.
Yes, harnessing steam pressure to run machinery and trains was pivotal to the industrial revolution, and yes, we are arguably in the midst of a new metamorphosis where AI would drive profound change.
For a start, AI’s impact would be far broader than that of the steam engine, which primarily transformed physical labor, manufacturing and transportation. Today, AI models can generate ideas and art. Marketing firms are using them to brainstorm ideas, video production companies to generate scripts and storyboards, musicians to produce songs. This represents an altogether different and wider impact on decision-making, creativity and even personal identity and the way people socialize. Note the rise of AI chatbots like Character.ai, Replika and Kindroid, which people are using for therapy, companionship and romance.
AI has also been adopted far more quickly (over a few decades) than the steam engine was (over centuries). Thomas Newcomen’s first commercially successful engine in the early 1700s was not improved on by James Watt until more than 60 years later. It would take another 150 years for steam power to be broadly adopted in manufacturing and railway locomotives.
Contrast that with the way machine-learning algorithms have become prevalent in social media, retailing, logistics and more in just the past two decades. The true catalyst, which gave rise to the latest era of “generative AI” that conjures text, images, voice and videos — and tools like ChatGPT and Midjourney — was invented just seven years ago.
There are also big differences in the ethical and social implications of the steam engine versus AI. The former increased the rate of urbanization and the exploitation of human labor. Meanwhile the latter’s ethical challenges are more nuanced and arguably more insidious, relating to our personal privacy, surveillance, an erosion of human agency and creativity, as well as potentially profound effects on personal freedoms.
Finally, nobody in their right mind ever worried about the steam engine going rogue and destroying civilization — but tens of millions of dollars are being spent to research just that possibility for AI.
Analogies are wonderful, but they should be picked with care when language has the power to shape opinion. During the Gulf War, for instance, the use of terms like “smart weapons” implied a bloodless conflict with precise targeting that was not actually possible.
Similarly, the discourse around AI teems with illusory terms like “intelligence” (machines are not intelligent), “neural networks” (they do not have brains) and “machine learning” (they do not understand and experience things in the way humans do), all helping to personify AI systems as something more human than they are in reality. “Steam engine,” whose harmful effects on human labor are a distant memory and which mostly brings to mind positive transformation, also does not give us the full picture of AI’s repercussions. It gives us a rose-tinted view of the future.
Here is a better analogy: the Internet. Not only did it seamlessly weave itself into the fabric of daily life, just as AI is doing, it evolved rapidly from its inception, revolutionizing media, and the way we socialize and communicate. The ethical problems it created around privacy, surveillance and misinformation are rearing their heads once again with AI, as are those around the concentration of power among a handful of Silicon Valley gatekeepers such as Alphabet Inc’s Google, Meta Platforms Inc, Amazon.com Inc and Apple Inc.
Comparing AI to the Internet offers a broader and more nuanced understanding of its potential impacts, not to mention one that has not been softened by the passage of time. We can still feel the positive and negative side effects of the Web on our lives.
Overall, it is a better comparison than the steam engine — as are the printing press, electricity and any other revolutionary inventions from the days of yore. If you are going to draw just one parallel from history for the potential of AI, stick with the Internet.
Parmy Olson is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology. A former reporter for the Wall Street Journal and Forbes, she is author of We Are Anonymous.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS