For fans of the aesthetic, Taiwan is hailed as a pilgrimage destination for all things cute. Not just Hello Kitty, but cutesy characters of all kinds are just as common in the alleys of Taipei’s trendy Ximending (西門町) area as on the desk of a bank employee.
Visitors are sometimes taken aback by its ubiquity, especially in the hallowed halls of business or government, but the cognitive dissonance resonant in the minds of many Westerners appears to be absent in Taiwan. The aesthetic of cuteness seems entwined into the nation’s very fabric.
The trend is by no means exclusive to Taiwan. Neighbor and one-time colonial ruler Japan created what is there called kawaii culture, birthing the commercial powerhouses that are Hello Kitty, Pikachu and many more. Taiwan has directly emulated much of kawaii culture, including mascots to promote travel regions and events that are sure to be featured in every photo opportunity.
Yet in politics, Taiwan seems to have taken kawaii to a new level. Ahead of the January presidential and legislative elections, as in previous elections, it was almost an imperative that the candidates create cartoonized versions of themselves.
In the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) case, supporters could purchase Line stickers of a dog and cat reminiscent of the party’s candidates, Vice President William Lai (賴清德) and former representative to the US Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), or alternatively bobble-headed cartoon stickers of Lai himself.
At the final Taiwan People’s Party rally on election eve, thousands of people thronged the streets around Ketagalan Boulevard sporting tiny green sprouts in their hair. Even tough-acting New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the former police officer who was the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, was photographed with cutesy police mascots.
Cuteness has been a part of political campaigning since as far back as 1998. Then running for Taipei mayor, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the DPP created a doll emblazoned with his nickname “A-bian.” They were an instant hit, inspiring the party to create followup versions and other accessories in subsequent elections.
The cohort of supporters more reminiscent of fan culture than politics helped Chen to victory in 2000, leading to Taiwan’s first exchange of political power since the KMT instituted martial law decades prior. Ever since, parties have had to adapt to this uniquely Taiwanese form of campaigning.
Why did Taiwan readily adopt a political aesthetic that would be unthinkable in most other nations? Taiwan nearly stands alone in the world for its peaceful and rapid transition to democracy, especially coming off the back of what at the time was the world’s longest period of martial law. With state brutality fresh in the minds of voters, the promise of a softer side to politics rang true. The DPP’s victory in 2000 marked the symbolic fulfillment of Taiwan’s road to democracy, completing the first peaceful transition of power on the back of popular support represented by the A-Bian doll and kawaii fan culture. Politicians’ subsequent embrace of cuteness is one and the same with their embrace of democracy as they seek to meet public expectations.
For proof, look no further than to Taiwan’s adversary across the Strait. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has cracked down on comparisons of his likeness to Winnie the Pooh, blacklisting the character from the Chinese Internet in 2017 and in 2018 banning the film Christopher Robin.
Authoritarians are afraid of cuteness, ostensibly because they fear it will create a weak populace. In reality, cuteness can drive an egalitarian movement that can be far more terrifying to a despot than weakness. Taiwan should remain proud of its kawaii culture and the democratic strength it belies.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
RSS