For fans of the aesthetic, Taiwan is hailed as a pilgrimage destination for all things cute. Not just Hello Kitty, but cutesy characters of all kinds are just as common in the alleys of Taipei’s trendy Ximending (西門町) area as on the desk of a bank employee.
Visitors are sometimes taken aback by its ubiquity, especially in the hallowed halls of business or government, but the cognitive dissonance resonant in the minds of many Westerners appears to be absent in Taiwan. The aesthetic of cuteness seems entwined into the nation’s very fabric.
The trend is by no means exclusive to Taiwan. Neighbor and one-time colonial ruler Japan created what is there called kawaii culture, birthing the commercial powerhouses that are Hello Kitty, Pikachu and many more. Taiwan has directly emulated much of kawaii culture, including mascots to promote travel regions and events that are sure to be featured in every photo opportunity.
Yet in politics, Taiwan seems to have taken kawaii to a new level. Ahead of the January presidential and legislative elections, as in previous elections, it was almost an imperative that the candidates create cartoonized versions of themselves.
In the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) case, supporters could purchase Line stickers of a dog and cat reminiscent of the party’s candidates, Vice President William Lai (賴清德) and former representative to the US Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), or alternatively bobble-headed cartoon stickers of Lai himself.
At the final Taiwan People’s Party rally on election eve, thousands of people thronged the streets around Ketagalan Boulevard sporting tiny green sprouts in their hair. Even tough-acting New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜), the former police officer who was the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) presidential candidate, was photographed with cutesy police mascots.
Cuteness has been a part of political campaigning since as far back as 1998. Then running for Taipei mayor, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the DPP created a doll emblazoned with his nickname “A-bian.” They were an instant hit, inspiring the party to create followup versions and other accessories in subsequent elections.
The cohort of supporters more reminiscent of fan culture than politics helped Chen to victory in 2000, leading to Taiwan’s first exchange of political power since the KMT instituted martial law decades prior. Ever since, parties have had to adapt to this uniquely Taiwanese form of campaigning.
Why did Taiwan readily adopt a political aesthetic that would be unthinkable in most other nations? Taiwan nearly stands alone in the world for its peaceful and rapid transition to democracy, especially coming off the back of what at the time was the world’s longest period of martial law. With state brutality fresh in the minds of voters, the promise of a softer side to politics rang true. The DPP’s victory in 2000 marked the symbolic fulfillment of Taiwan’s road to democracy, completing the first peaceful transition of power on the back of popular support represented by the A-Bian doll and kawaii fan culture. Politicians’ subsequent embrace of cuteness is one and the same with their embrace of democracy as they seek to meet public expectations.
For proof, look no further than to Taiwan’s adversary across the Strait. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) has cracked down on comparisons of his likeness to Winnie the Pooh, blacklisting the character from the Chinese Internet in 2017 and in 2018 banning the film Christopher Robin.
Authoritarians are afraid of cuteness, ostensibly because they fear it will create a weak populace. In reality, cuteness can drive an egalitarian movement that can be far more terrifying to a despot than weakness. Taiwan should remain proud of its kawaii culture and the democratic strength it belies.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS