Canada’s population surpassed 40 million last year, recording its highest growth rate since 1957.
The vast majority of this growth — 97.6 percent — was from international migration, both permanent (almost 500,000 people) and temporary (just more than 800,000). As a cosmopolitan and classical liberal, I applaud this kind of openness. Yet, it also worries me.
It is not just Canada — Ireland, New Zealand and the UK are seeing historically high levels of immigration as well.
Illustration: Yusha
How long would citizens of these countries continue to accept this trend? Who exactly benefits, and how? Why has the backlash not been stronger?
After all, immigrants do not bring an immediate economic boom.
When New Zealand closed its borders during COVID-19, for example, output did not fall and the post-pandemic resumption of immigration did not cause a noticeable boost. Meanwhile, in the UK, economic stagnation has accompanied a wave of immigration.
Whatever the benefits of the migrant arrivals might be, they lie in the more distant future, which does not help its political popularity now.
Yet, for all the cultural and economic adjustments immigration might require, it is hard to avoid the conclusion that, for many countries, high rates of immigration are simply flat-out necessary.
In Canada, for instance, the current fertility rate is about 1.33 children per woman, the lowest on record, and it probably would have been lower yet without recent immigrant arrivals.
Canada’s geography also argues for more immigration. It is likely to have much more usable territory, due to global warming, so a much larger population is feasible.
If Canada wants to maintain a reasonable balance of power with the US and have the resources to develop and protect its Arctic and Arctic-adjacent areas, it needs a commensurately large population and economy.
Toronto has become one of the most interesting cities in North America and immigrants deserve much of the credit for that, as well as for the growth of Vancouver.
Canada is now also a premier spot for international dining. My point is not to make travel recommendations (though the restaurants in the town of Scarborough remain a particular favorite), but to show how Canada is connected to many global trends that would help keep it vital.
In general, Canada — like Ireland, where the fertility rate is about 1.77, higher than in Canada, but still below replacement — faces a choice: either take in migrants or depopulate.
Perhaps one reason voters are tolerating such high migration rates is an intuitive fear of living in an empty, stagnant country. Voters tend to want their country to be able to project influence and defend its interests.
Economic debates about immigration typically focus on the wage effects on domestic workers, and there, the impact of immigration is often neutral or marginal. However, the more important effects of immigration might be more impressionistic: how it affects people’s views of their own country and what it is like to live there, as well as its global reputation.
In this sense, Canada is ahead of much of the rest of the world in seeing the importance of these factors and turning it into actionable policy. It is willing to give up some of its present cultural identity to achieve a brighter cultural and political future.
This trade-off is much better than it looks at first. For one thing, birth rates for native-born citizens might fall further than they have already.
If a country wants to preserve its national culture, it might be better off allowing more migration now, when there is still a critical mass of native-born citizens to ease assimilation.
To put the point more generally: Whatever costs there might be to immigration, successful nations would have to deal with them sooner or later. And the sooner they do, the better off they would be.
The choice is not so much between more immigration and less immigration, but rather a lot of immigration now or a lot later. This choice would become all the more pressing as the need to fund national retirement programs requires for more tax-paying citizens.
One of the most common criticisms of immigrants is that they push up real estate prices. Yet there is a home-grown explanation: Stringent regulations on building make it difficult for the supply of housing to respond when demand increases.
In fact, there is a way immigration can help address this problem.
First, immigrants might themselves induce their adopted country to free up its real estate markets. So, immigration might increase real estate costs in the short run, but help reduce them in the longer run.
Second, immigrants can help lower-tier cities move to the fore. The suburbs of Toronto, for example, have seen much of their growth driven by Asian in-migration, and longer term that would give Canadians more residential (and commercial) options.
These points aside, note that higher real estate prices, to the extent they result from immigrant demands, largely translate into capital gains for homeowners — most of whom are native-born.
To be sure, the higher home prices might be bad for many younger Canadians, who might be locked out of housing markets, but eventually many of them would inherit high-value homes from their parents.
My argument is not that there are no short-run transition costs to high levels of immigration — especially in housing, where Canada is seeing some now. However, in the long term, more immigration is better for a country than less.
To me, the question is not so much why Canada and similar countries are allowing so much immigration. It is how long voters in these countries would allow this experiment to continue.
Tyler Cowen is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist, a professor of economics at George Mason University and host of the Marginal Revolution blog.
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
The bird flu outbreak at US dairy farms keeps finding alarming new ways to surprise scientists. Last week, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) confirmed that H5N1 is spreading not just from birds to herds, but among cows. Meanwhile, media reports say that an unknown number of cows are asymptomatic. Although the risk to humans is still low, it is clear that far more work needs to be done to get a handle on the reach of the virus and how it is being transmitted. That would require the USDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to get
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
On April 11, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida delivered a speech at a joint meeting of the US Congress in Washington, in which he said that “China’s current external stance and military actions present an unprecedented and the greatest strategic challenge … to the peace and stability of the international community.” Kishida emphasized Japan’s role as “the US’ closest ally.” “The international order that the US worked for generations to build is facing new challenges,” Kishida said. “I understand it is a heavy burden to carry such hopes on your shoulders,” he said. “Japan is already standing shoulder to shoulder