The earthquake measuring 7.2 on the Richter scale in Hualien County on Wednesday was a very rare case involving continuous movement and the deformation of compressed plates.
Taipei and New Taipei City, with a combined area of 2,457 km2 and a population of nearly 7 million, are largely located in a weak lake sedimentary basin. As a result, the magnitude and duration of shaking during the earthquake were greater there than in other areas, and were even close to what occurred in areas near the epicenter of the earthquake.
Fortunately, the seismic resistance capacity structures in Taiwan are markedly better than those in many other countries.
From the instantaneous ground motion seismogram, one can see that the highest intensity, level 6, was detected in Hualien County’s Heping (和平) Station, which is only about 38km away from the epicenter — with the highest north-south, east-west and vertical acceleration of gravity being 363, 352 and 224 gal respectively, while the duration of shaking was about 60 seconds.
Hualien City was only about 25km from the epicenter of the earthquake — with its highest north-south, east-west and vertical acceleration of gravity being 458, 256 and 209 gal respectively, while the duration of shaking was about 60 seconds.
The observation stations in Taipei are about 145km from the epicenter of the earthquake — but the highest north-south, east-west and vertical acceleration of gravity recorded was 86, 57 and 36 gal respectively, while the duration of shaking was about 100 seconds.
As the duration was no less than that of the 921 Earthquake, the amplitude and lengthened duration of oscillation could damage high-rise buildings. This is the nature of buildings in a basin, so all one can do is try to avoid living in dangerous areas or invest heavily in improving the safety coefficient.
Taiwan is located in the island arc of the Circum-Pacific seismic zone, where about 90 percent of the world’s earthquakes occur.
The five major north-south mountain ranges in Taiwan have taken shape because the active Philippine Sea plate moves by 8cm about 35 degrees toward the northwest every year, pushing against the Eurasian continental plate.
Consequently, there are countless faults and steep mountains all over Taiwan, with 268 mountains that are more than 3,000m high, which is far more than the roughly 10 in Japan and about 20 in New Zealand. The number of high mountains shows the complexity of Taiwan’s geological structure and the natural disasters it can cause, which are very risky and should not be underestimated.
Taiwan’s key national policies should therefore include: planning of a second capital for emergency preparedness; restriction of the use of mountainous areas for national land development; management of coastal areas, rivers and outlying islands; connections between public facilities and urban communities; resilience against disasters; and post-disaster recovery.
The administrations of the outgoing and incoming presidents would surely take into consideration the chances of such natural disasters. They should implement more carbon reduction projects, “green” buildings and standard modular construction made of pre-cast units.
Promoting such sustainable self-supporting buildings would lead Taiwan on the road to prosperity.
Lai Ming-huang is an engineer with a doctorate from National Cheng Kung University and a former regional engineering department head of the Directorate-General of Highways.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval