An earthquake that measured 7.2 on the Richter scale struck the east coast of Taiwan on Wednesday morning and was felt across the nation. Thirteen deaths had been confirmed as of Saturday, with more than 1,000 people injured and hundreds stranded or trapped, mainly in the remote and mountainous areas of Hualien County. It was the strongest earthquake since the 921 Earthquake, which measured 7.3 on the Richter scale and struck central Taiwan on Sept. 11, 1999, resulting in more than 2,400 deaths and destroying tens of thousands of buildings.
While most local media have focused on updates on the details of damage, infrastructure repairs and rescue efforts across the nation, many foreign news agencies reported on how Taiwan has over the past two decades become “well prepared” and “resilient” against major earthquakes. This was demonstrated by the relatively low casualty figures and minimal damage, compared with earthquakes of a similar magnitude in other countries and the 921 quake. Taiwan has since made great strides, including implementing strict anti-seismic building codes, retrofitting buildings, establishing national centers for earthquake response coordination and training, setting up a sophisticated early warning system, raising public awareness, running safety drills in schools, having highly trained search-and-rescue teams and implementing efficient relief measures.
“Taiwan’s earthquake preparedness is among the most advanced in the world,” Missouri University of Science and Technology seismologist Stephen Gao was cited by the Associated Press as saying.
Many political leaders and organizations have expressed their condolences and support for Taiwanese, and spotlighted how it was “well prepared,” “resilient,” “responded fast,” “emerged remarkably unscathed” and was “shaken but unbowed” from the quake. Taiwan can be proud of this, as it has steadily built its resilience and gained international recognition by helping others and proving to be responsible internationally over the past few years.
However, in a meeting about children’s rights, Chinese Deputy Ambassador to the UN Geng Shuang (耿爽) mentioned the quake in “China’s Taiwan” and said “We thank the international community for its expressions of sympathy and concern,” Reuters reported.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs condemned China’s “shameless use of the Taiwan earthquake to conduct cognitive operations internationally.” Beijing’s offer of aid was also quickly declined by the Mainland Affairs Council, as experience has shown that China’s help is always conditional and politically motivated.
After the 921 Earthquake, China obstructed aid from other countries and the UN, and pushed its “one China” policy agenda, expressing gratitude “on behalf of the Taiwan people.” China has also repeatedly blocked Taiwan from being recognized by other countries and fully participating in international organizations, including exclusion from the WHO during the SARS and COVID-19 outbreaks.
While Taiwan’s military personnel were conducting search-and-rescue and disaster relief operations, Beijing continued its daily harassment by operating military aircraft and vessels around Taiwan, with a few entering the air defense identification zone.
In Taiwan, although many local government search-and-rescue teams were quickly deployed — including Kaohsiung’s teams, which arrived by noon — the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) only highlighted 12 local government rescue teams with KMT heads. KMT caucus whip Fu Kun-chi also only expressed his gratitude to the KMT’s Taipei and Taichung mayors.
Meanwhile, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) sobbed over historical figures during his visit to China and reminded Taiwanese to “be proud of being ‘yan huang zisun’ (炎黃子孫)” or descendants of emperors Yan and Huang.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS