No more plastic lanterns
On Sunday mornings, I often take a walk on the beach in the countryside. The air is always fresh. As I walk, I often pick up garbage that drifts ashore. Today, I found an unusual piece of garbage: an extensive piece of nylon with a long string. It was a sky lantern.
In northern Taiwan, Pingsi (平溪) in New Taipei City is where sky lanterns are released. The town is close to Taiwan proper’s northeast coast. It might be unlikely for fallen sky lanterns to drift to the north coast, but due to the tides and waves, it was not entirely impossible. Judging from the remaining parts, it did not look like an ordinary sky lantern from Pingsi. Perhaps it was from Shihmen (石門) or Jinshan (金山). It should be emphasized that if this piece of garbage had not been made of plastic, it could have decomposed naturally, rather than drifting into the ocean and becoming an environmental problem.
Therefore, it is strongly advised that all sky lanterns be made of wax paper. No plastic materials should be used in the process. What is best for the environment should be considered first. Even if the cost were to drastically increase, we should use bamboo sticks as the lantern frame. Releasing sky lanterns is an act of praying for good luck and safety. If people could spend a little more money for the sake of the environment, they would certainly be blessed more. Besides, it might create more problems if people only think about saving some money and their convenience. If a plastic sky lantern falls on the ground, it might cause a fire, and if it falls into the ocean, it might cost the life of a fish. Such deeds are against reason and nature. If people do that, the wishes they make while releasing a sky lantern would never come true. The Ministry of Environment should ban the use of plastic materials in making sky lanterns. A small regulation would lead to immediate results and immense benefits.
Chen Yen-ling
Taipei
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS