Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Fu Kun-chi have proposed carrying out the extension project of the Shuishalian Freeway (Freeway No. 6) to Hualien County.
For Hualien residents, it is great news. However, we should wait and see whether this is an empty promise from politicians.
Due to the Central Mountain Range, it takes a long time to travel from Nantou County to Hualien County, despite them being adjacent to each other. It requires people to go a long way — half a loop of Taiwan — or to use Provincial Highway No. 7. The journey takes at least four to five hours.
The administration of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) tried construct a Nantou-Hualien expressway, but the project was abandoned for a few reasons. For one, the project would require an enormous budget of NT$500 billion (US$15.6 billion).
It would also pass near a tectonic fault line.
For a long time, Hualien residents have been looking forward to the extension of Freeway No. 6. That way, those from Hualien living elsewhere would be able to travel home more conveniently and safely. Of course, people also hope that the transportation system could be improved so that it would be easier to travel from Hualien to central and western Taiwan. This could revitalize Hualien’s economy and people living there could earn more.
However, are these expectations realistic? How would such goals be achieved?
Even if the difficulties in road construction could be overcome, there are other problems.
All Taiwanese should think carefully about the disadvantages of the extension project. Shortening the travel time from Hualien to central Taiwan would bring both merits and drawbacks.
Taiwanese must think of the project in a rational and comprehensive way.
Hualien is called “Taiwan’s back garden.” The county boasts mountains, forests and the ocean, which have not been exposed to too much environmental damage. Hualien is, to some extent, isolated from other places, so air and water pollution are not so serious there as in other places.
Due to this, many people love to travel to Hualien and stay there for a few days, having a healthy and carefree countryside experience.
If Hualien could be reached more easily, industry would move there. Hualien residents would not be able to stop the tide.
After industrial sectors relocate to Hualien, the county’s natural environment would likely be damaged.
For the hospitality industry, the improvement of transportation is not necessarily a good thing either. If people in western Taiwan could visit Hualien on day trips, nobody would need to spend a night there. Hotels would not benefit from a more convenient transportation system. Moreover, if a great number of tourists travel to Hualien every day, there could be serious problems in traffic.
Everyone would have to cope with the issue of pollution and “Taiwan’s back garden” would be damaged.
Advanced countries pay much more attention to saving energy and reducing carbon emissions.
Taiwan should not be fixated on improving the transportation system.
Instead, Taiwanese should think about sustainability — devoting themselves to the preservation of the mountains, forests and ecology as a whole — and leave a healthy environment to the next generations.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of Shuili Junior High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Emma Liu
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
President William Lai Ching-te’s (賴清德) May 20 second-anniversary address was not just a routine policy review; it was damage control. US President Donald Trump’s remarks — that he did not want to see anyone move toward independence and that the delivery of a major Taiwan arms package could depend on the progress of US-China relations — unsettled Taiwan’s public and created an opening for opposition parties to question whether Taiwan was being treated as a bargaining chip in Washington’s dealings with Beijing. Lai’s speech was designed to close that opening. The address covered the expected ground: sovereignty, cross-strait relations, defense spending,
RSS