Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Fu Kun-chi have proposed carrying out the extension project of the Shuishalian Freeway (Freeway No. 6) to Hualien County.
For Hualien residents, it is great news. However, we should wait and see whether this is an empty promise from politicians.
Due to the Central Mountain Range, it takes a long time to travel from Nantou County to Hualien County, despite them being adjacent to each other. It requires people to go a long way — half a loop of Taiwan — or to use Provincial Highway No. 7. The journey takes at least four to five hours.
The administration of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) tried construct a Nantou-Hualien expressway, but the project was abandoned for a few reasons. For one, the project would require an enormous budget of NT$500 billion (US$15.6 billion).
It would also pass near a tectonic fault line.
For a long time, Hualien residents have been looking forward to the extension of Freeway No. 6. That way, those from Hualien living elsewhere would be able to travel home more conveniently and safely. Of course, people also hope that the transportation system could be improved so that it would be easier to travel from Hualien to central and western Taiwan. This could revitalize Hualien’s economy and people living there could earn more.
However, are these expectations realistic? How would such goals be achieved?
Even if the difficulties in road construction could be overcome, there are other problems.
All Taiwanese should think carefully about the disadvantages of the extension project. Shortening the travel time from Hualien to central Taiwan would bring both merits and drawbacks.
Taiwanese must think of the project in a rational and comprehensive way.
Hualien is called “Taiwan’s back garden.” The county boasts mountains, forests and the ocean, which have not been exposed to too much environmental damage. Hualien is, to some extent, isolated from other places, so air and water pollution are not so serious there as in other places.
Due to this, many people love to travel to Hualien and stay there for a few days, having a healthy and carefree countryside experience.
If Hualien could be reached more easily, industry would move there. Hualien residents would not be able to stop the tide.
After industrial sectors relocate to Hualien, the county’s natural environment would likely be damaged.
For the hospitality industry, the improvement of transportation is not necessarily a good thing either. If people in western Taiwan could visit Hualien on day trips, nobody would need to spend a night there. Hotels would not benefit from a more convenient transportation system. Moreover, if a great number of tourists travel to Hualien every day, there could be serious problems in traffic.
Everyone would have to cope with the issue of pollution and “Taiwan’s back garden” would be damaged.
Advanced countries pay much more attention to saving energy and reducing carbon emissions.
Taiwan should not be fixated on improving the transportation system.
Instead, Taiwanese should think about sustainability — devoting themselves to the preservation of the mountains, forests and ecology as a whole — and leave a healthy environment to the next generations.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of Shuili Junior High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Emma Liu
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS