Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Fu Kun-chi have proposed carrying out the extension project of the Shuishalian Freeway (Freeway No. 6) to Hualien County.
For Hualien residents, it is great news. However, we should wait and see whether this is an empty promise from politicians.
Due to the Central Mountain Range, it takes a long time to travel from Nantou County to Hualien County, despite them being adjacent to each other. It requires people to go a long way — half a loop of Taiwan — or to use Provincial Highway No. 7. The journey takes at least four to five hours.
The administration of former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) tried construct a Nantou-Hualien expressway, but the project was abandoned for a few reasons. For one, the project would require an enormous budget of NT$500 billion (US$15.6 billion).
It would also pass near a tectonic fault line.
For a long time, Hualien residents have been looking forward to the extension of Freeway No. 6. That way, those from Hualien living elsewhere would be able to travel home more conveniently and safely. Of course, people also hope that the transportation system could be improved so that it would be easier to travel from Hualien to central and western Taiwan. This could revitalize Hualien’s economy and people living there could earn more.
However, are these expectations realistic? How would such goals be achieved?
Even if the difficulties in road construction could be overcome, there are other problems.
All Taiwanese should think carefully about the disadvantages of the extension project. Shortening the travel time from Hualien to central Taiwan would bring both merits and drawbacks.
Taiwanese must think of the project in a rational and comprehensive way.
Hualien is called “Taiwan’s back garden.” The county boasts mountains, forests and the ocean, which have not been exposed to too much environmental damage. Hualien is, to some extent, isolated from other places, so air and water pollution are not so serious there as in other places.
Due to this, many people love to travel to Hualien and stay there for a few days, having a healthy and carefree countryside experience.
If Hualien could be reached more easily, industry would move there. Hualien residents would not be able to stop the tide.
After industrial sectors relocate to Hualien, the county’s natural environment would likely be damaged.
For the hospitality industry, the improvement of transportation is not necessarily a good thing either. If people in western Taiwan could visit Hualien on day trips, nobody would need to spend a night there. Hotels would not benefit from a more convenient transportation system. Moreover, if a great number of tourists travel to Hualien every day, there could be serious problems in traffic.
Everyone would have to cope with the issue of pollution and “Taiwan’s back garden” would be damaged.
Advanced countries pay much more attention to saving energy and reducing carbon emissions.
Taiwan should not be fixated on improving the transportation system.
Instead, Taiwanese should think about sustainability — devoting themselves to the preservation of the mountains, forests and ecology as a whole — and leave a healthy environment to the next generations.
Chen Chi-nung is principal of Shuili Junior High School in Nantou County.
Translated by Emma Liu
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises