The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13.
The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said.
Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan.
Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and passing bills facilitating arms sales to Taiwan demonstrate that the US government is keen to aid Taiwan’s defense. However, the US is facing conflicts on several fronts, such as the Houthis’ attacks on shipping in the Red Sea, Russia’s ongoing war of aggression against Ukraine, Israel’s war with Hamas in the Gaza Strip, North Korea’s long-range missile launches that threaten to destabilize the Korean Peninsula and China’s continuous acts of aggression in the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait.
The plurality of these zones with high tension or conflict means that US production is unable to keep up with demand for missile systems and other weapons. A win-win step for Washington would be to collaborate with Taiwanese contractors to build missiles and other weapons systems for regional use. Japan is making Patriot missiles, while Harpoon and Sidewinder missile systems are built in the US by McDonnell Douglas and Raytheon respectively. Building these weapons in Taiwan would mean faster delivery and enable quick stockpiling of weapons in Taiwan to be used by US troops in the event of a war.
This could also benefit the Philippines, a country facing harassment from an increasingly aggressive China in parts of the South China Sea which the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague in 2016 declared to be Philippine territory. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken on Tuesday reaffirmed Washington’s commitment to defending the Philippines against attacks in the South China Sea.
Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr following his meeting with Blinken said that he emphasized the importance of “more substantial US investments towards enhancing our defense and civilian law enforcement capabilities.”
The China Coast Guard has already attacked Philippine vessels with water cannons. Although the US might be seeking to avoid escalation by directly confronting Chinese vessels, it could at least help the Philippines better arm itself — with arms manufactured in Taiwan.
China is threatened by those bases, and it has attempted to drive a wedge between Manila and Washington. Beijing has accused the US of using the Philippines as a “pawn” in South China Sea disputes.
Polls by the Pew Research Center suggest that Filipinos largely have a favorable opinion of the US, but Washington should seek to maintain that situation by taking concrete actions to give Filipino fishers and supply boat operators a sense of security in Philippine and international waters.
The US is being stretched thin by its numerous engagements worldwide, but it could alleviate some of its burden by having its allies and partners do more of the heavy lifting. Washington could lead an initiative to have Taiwan, the Philippines, Japan, South Korea and other regional partners cooperate with the US and each other on maritime patrols and weapons manufacturing. The US has an indispensable role to play in regional security, but it should not take on the full burden on its own.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS