Exactly a decade ago today, university students and civic groups from throughout Taiwan congregated in the Legislative Yuan in a demonstration against the then-ruling Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) hasty attempt to pass a proposed Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement.
Apprehensive that the agreement might allow Beijing to put Taiwan’s autonomy in severe jeopardy via economic means, protesters occupied the legislature and chanted slogans to voice their outrage.
Initially, the government stood firm on its intent to implement the agreement, with demonstrators dispersed by police force and water cannons as they endeavored to expand their activities to the Executive Yuan. However, after generating widespread support among the public, the protesters eventually succeeded in compelling the government to revoke it.
This later became known as the Sunflower movement, the largest mass demonstration in Taiwan since democratization.
Many attribute the consolidation of Taiwan’s democracy to the movement, believing that it successfully prevented China from influencing Taiwan’s population demographics. They also complimented the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for enabling Taiwan to become an integral part of the global economy through its rejection of the agreement.
As time passed, the Sunflower movement gradually faded from Taiwanese’s memories. However, it has resurfaced in recent months after Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) advocated for the resumption of negotiations on the service trade agreement in June of last year.
The remark immediately drew intense backlash, as many accused him of exploiting the protest to bolster his mayoral campaign in 2014, only to later abandon its core intention.
TPP legislator Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), one of the leading figures in the demonstration, also received harsh criticism for endorsing Ko in this year’s presidential election, despite Ko’s ambiguous stance on the enforcement of the cross-strait treaty.
After the presidential election, similar concerns have continued to arise upon the KMT and TPP’s recent proposal to shorten the naturalization process for Chinese spouses.
Opponents of the proposal contend that as Chinese nationals are not required to relinquish their nationality prior to their acquisition of Taiwanese citizenship, the Chinese government could easily take advantage of these naturalized citizens to manipulate the election outcomes, thereby posing a threat to Taiwan’s sovereignty. They also argue that exempting Chinese spouses from taking the citizenship test could cast doubt on their allegiance to the country, which could imperil Taiwan’s national security.
Polling from TVBS News showed that 89 percent of all respondents disapproved of the plan to shorten the citizenship application procedure for Chinese immigrants, which indicates that the opposition parties’ proposition is at odds with the opinion of the majority.
Worried that the proposal might place a heavy burden on the national healthcare system, thoracic surgery division doctor Tu Cheng-che (杜承哲) launched a petition campaign against the proposal on Feb. 27, which attracted more than 90,000 signatures within three days.
Just a decade from the abandonment of the CSSTA, a proposal that would have had detrimental consequences for the nation, it is ironic that a bill on Chinese spouses is being deliberated in the legislature.
Both would potentially render the nation’s political structure more vulnerable to Chinese influence. Hence, critics of the opposition parties’ proposal have urged them to act in adherence to public opinion — lest the same mistake committed 10 years ago be repeated.
Reflecting upon the Sunflower movement’s legacy, it is imperative that we not only recognize the significance of cherishing democracy and resisting foreign aggression, but also hold politicians accountable, ensuring the voices of their constituents are upheld in the legislature.
More importantly, maintaining democracy requires the concerted cooperation of the entire society. Communication must therefore be regularly held between political parties and citizens, so that the overall interests of Taiwanese can be thoroughly safeguarded.
Tshua Siu-ui is a Taiwanese student studying international relations and politics in Norwich, England.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
In China, competition is fierce, and in many cases suppliers do not get paid on time. Rather than improving, the situation appears to be deteriorating. BYD Co, the world’s largest electric vehicle manufacturer by production volume, has gained notoriety for its harsh treatment of suppliers, raising concerns about the long-term sustainability. The case also highlights the decline of China’s business environment, and the growing risk of a cascading wave of corporate failures. BYD generally does not follow China’s Negotiable Instruments Law when settling payments with suppliers. Instead the company has created its own proprietary supply chain finance system called the “D-chain,” through which
RSS