Just southeast of Johannesburg, in a South African region known as the Vaal Triangle, 1.7 million people are living in a crossfire of some of the most dangerous pollution on Earth.
From the highway into Vanderbijlpark, you can see the heavy veil of smoke that cloaks Africa’s biggest steel mill. To the southeast, near the town of Vereeniging, the Lethabo Power Station, whose name means “happiness,” joylessly belches out ash and toxic sulfur dioxide. Further south, outside a petrochemicals plant in Sasolburg, an adjacent neighborhood regularly reeks of rotten eggs from hydrogen sulfide in the air.
The plants offer steady work for residents at a time when one in three South Africans is unemployed, yet they are also pumping out harmful emissions at levels so high that Vereeniging is, by some measures, the most polluted city in the world.
Illustration: Yusha
The toxins are causing hundreds of premature deaths every year across the Vaal Triangle and respiratory disease for many of those still breathing. The situation is a stark reminder of the toll the world’s dependency on steel, oil and coal is having on human health and the difficulty a green transition faces if it costs the livelihood of the workers who depend on old-economy jobs.
Vereeniging is relatively unknown outside of South Africa, but the country owes much of its status as the “most industrialized nation on the continent” to it. It was the site of the country’s first coal discovery in 1878, which helped industrialists Sammy Marks and Hendrik van der Bijl establish one of South Africa’s most concentrated industrial areas.
At the town’s Vaal Teknorama Museum, the last lump of coal extracted from the Cornelia mine sits on a desk. A 1923 painting shows a happy image of the local Vaal River, with leisure boats sailing down a watercourse lined with steel mills and power plants.
Coal has ensured industrialization and economic growth in the area, a plaque proclaims.
Today, it has a darker claim to fame.
Vereeniging regularly registers the highest concentration of microscopic emissions known as PM2.5, Bloomberg Green’s analysis of data from OpenAQ — an environmental nonprofit monitoring particulate pollution — showed. The often invisible particulates travel deep into the lungs, which could lead to cancer and cardiac problems.
In the Vaal Triangle, many of them are emitted from industrial plants, which means they often include heavy metals and other toxins that are far more harmful than ordinary dust, South African air quality consultant Ranajit Sahu said.
The problem has been on the South African government’s radar for decades.
In the mid-2000s, it declared the area as the Vaal Triangle Airshed Priority Area, the first zone in which it would make a concentrated effort to lower air pollution. However, the air quality has hardly improved as companies have applied for, and received, exemptions to emission limits and dysfunctional municipalities have stopped collecting waste, forcing residents to burn it. Traffic on the highways crisscrossing the region only adds to the pollution.
Power utility Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd and petrochemicals company Sasol Ltd have repeatedly said they cannot afford or do not have the space to install the equipment required by law to reduce sulfur dioxide pollution. In the past, ArcelorMittal SA has threatened to shut down the formerly state-owned steel mill. They have also repeatedly urged the government to consider the impact of tighter and more expensive pollution standards on their operations in a country with one of the world’s highest unemployment rates.
This resistance may soon be futile. The environment ministry, under new leadership, has signaled that it expects the companies to comply with tougher pollution limits set to come into effect in 2025. ArcelorMittal and the government have also been sued by activists who previously won a ruling that the state was breaching the constitutional right to clean air in nearby Mpumalanga.
No settlement in the area has had to make a bigger sacrifice for South Africa’s economic gains than the township of Sharpeville, close to Eskom’s Lethabo power plant.
The facility burns low-quality coal, meaning more pollution is produced per unit of energy generated.
Two-hundred-and-four premature deaths a year could be attributed to the Lethabo plant, a 2017 study by UK-based air pollution expert Mike Holland showed. This was one of the first studies to detail the scale of power plant pollution in South Africa. It has since been challenged by Eskom, which said its own research has found that it kills about 330 people annually across all of its plants.
Lethabo exceeded emission limits for particulate matter, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides 620 times between April 2016 and December 2017, more than any of the other 14 Eskom plants, a separate study by Sahu showed.
Portia Mofokeng, 35, is one of the residents who live within breathing distance of Lethabo. She developed asthma in 2013 and blames her condition and regular visits to the hospital on industrial pollution. Mofokeng can see the cooling towers of the plant from her corrugated steel shack in Mooidraai, a field that once belonged to a local farm.
“The doctor told me if I want to get healed, I must move from here, go to maybe where there’s no pollution, but I have nowhere to go,” she said, sitting on a cloth-covered chair clutching two inhalers, which cost around a few dollars each. She often has to buy the medication herself out of a US$18 monthly welfare check.
When she applied for work as a safety warden at Lethabo she was told her condition precluded her from getting the job.
The industries that make her ill are seen by her community as the only sure source of jobs in the region. That means there is little opposition from the community.
“Their brothers, their cousins work there, so what’s going to happen?” she asked.
Nearby is Zamdela, an impoverished township that abuts Sasol’s Sigma Colliery and its Sasolburg petrochemicals plant. If you run your hand down the staircase railings of a largely abandoned block of apartments, your hand comes away black with coal dust.
It monitors dust at its “fence line,” the company says.
In a small brick house, Kido Mafisi, who has lived in Zamdela since the late 1970s, displays her medication and said she often awakens to find black and gray dust on her window ledges.
“I can’t breathe,” she said. “I have asthma, bronchitis and skin rashes.”
Progress has been made on air quality in the Vaal Triangle, South Africa’s environmental department said, noting that big companies such as Sasol, ArcelorMittal and Eskom have taken some steps to curb their emissions.
It slashed particulate emissions by 87 percent since 2007 by suppressing dust and replacing old coal-burning equipment, ArcelorMittal said. It has also reduced other pollutants.
Meanwhile, particulate emissions have been cut by 75 percent since 2000 by the installation of electrostatic precipitators — devices that attract dust to electrically charged plates — Sasol said.
In contrast, Eskom’s particulate emissions are at a 31-year high. The pollution is exacerbated by the fact that sulfur dioxide, emitted as a gas, often oxidizes with water vapor to form sulfuric acid particles.
The company runs an offset program that mitigates its particulate matter emissions by removing communal waste that would have otherwise been burnt, Sasol said. Eskom is considering a similar program.
Still, there is little evidence of waste collection.
Across the road from Sasol’s plant, pigs and goats pick through rubbish dumped on the open ground adjacent to rows of small government-built brick houses and tin shacks.
Residents regularly burn refuse as it is no longer cleared by the municipality, waste collector Bernard Mafata said. He drags his trolley between the informal dumps and recycling centers.
Its offset projects equate to preventing the emission of 40 metric tonnes of particulate emissions annually, or 0.5 percent of its annual production of pollutants, Sasol said, stressing that the program is not designed to result in “like-for-like” mitigation.
In an area of the world as polluted as the Vaal Triangle, it could be difficult to see any positive changes on the horizon. However, there are some faint signals.
On top of the government’s new emission limits next year, there is growing international pressure for companies across South Africa to clean up their operations.
Some of the world’s richest nations are funding a US$9.3 billion plan to help South Africa transition away from coal.
The Lethabo plant, which is due to start closing down in 2036, might follow the path of older Eskom facilities. These are slated to be converted to facilities for renewable energy and other activities through the incentive program.
Sasol is also operating a pilot green hydrogen facility in Sasolburg, a fact that it advertises on a billboard in the city.
If these developments succeed, they will aid the battle against the long-term threat of climate change. However, they would not help the people who are inhaling coal’s nasty legacy now.
For residents living in the mess left by South Africa’s industrial giants, patience is running thin.
“We’d like to get compensation. They must pay for us,” Mofokeng said. “They are causing the problem.”
With assistance from Eric Roston and Brian Kahn.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS