Electricity rates might be raised in April, a recent announcement from the Ministry of Economic Affairs said.
This has triggered a series of debates.
Since a 3 percent hike was introduced in 2018, electricity rates have remained the same for over four years.
In terms of electricity rates, globally, Taiwan ranks the fourth-lowest when it comes to household electricity prices and sixth-lowest for industrial electricity prices, statistics released by the International Energy Agency in 2020 showed.
Currently, average household electricity rates are NT$2.56 per kilowatt-hour (kWh), much lower than that of South Korea (NT$3.07/kWh) and Japan (NT$7.54/kWh). In Denmark, the price is NT$9/kWh.
The cost of fuel has increased drastically over the past two years.
Many countries, such as Japan, South Korea, the US and Germany, have adjusted their electricity rates accordingly since 2021.
In Taiwan, the government’s policy is to absorb as much of the cost as possible.
This is so that the public’s basic needs are met and so that the possibility of inflation rising due to electricity price hikes could be avoided.
However, these days, fuel prices show no signs of decreasing and it looks like the costs of energy will continue to increase in the near future.
To deal with such a situation in a responsible way, electricity rates must be raised in Taiwan.
It is only by doing so that costs could be covered and that Taiwan Power Co (Taipower) could function in a sustainable way.
Taipower has been experiencing deficits for two years. Despite an electricity subsidy of NT$50 billion (US$1.58 billion) from the government, the company’s losses still reached NT$198.5 billion last year.
As such, electricity rates should be modified in accordance with the costs.
Reasonable rates would also help the public understand what it takes to use electricity, which might lead to lower energy usage and a reduction in carbon emissions.
However, the public might have a hard time accepting this increase in electricity prices.
The government could take the initiative to impose an “energy tax,” requiring all users of electricity to pay a certain amount.
This tax should be based on the principle of “those who pollute the environment more should pay more.”
It would be imposed on the sources of power generation systems and the tax would be based on the amount of carbon emissions.
To be specific, it is the private companies that collaborate with Taipower that should be taxed.
This would help the public understand more about electricity rates and debunk the myth that renewable energy is more expensive.
The tax energy policy might also encourage the more efficient usage of electricity, reducing costs.
When raising electricity prices, the government should take certain groups of people, such as the disadvantaged and small business owners, into consideration and do their best to mitigate the impact on them.
For larger companies and those who consume more electricity, the government should make it clear that they must pay more.
Those who use more electricity should not be subsidized.
The government should not go against the grain of social justice by robbing the poor and assisting the rich.
Dino Wei is an information engineer in Yilan County.
Translated by Emma Liu
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS