Since the presidential and legislative elections on Jan. 13, absentee voting has once again become part of national discourse. Stories of Taiwanese returning from far-flung places across the globe are heartwarming ahead of elections, but always initiate pause for recourse in the weeks that follow.
Why should a citizen living abroad have to dig into their savings to exercise their democratic right? Why should a person working in Taipei have to fight the crowd to return to a hometown they never visit? Even more galling, why do politicians continue to allow thousands of military service members and prisoners to be de facto disenfranchised?
Proponents of absentee voting rightly point to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights for moral grounding. Surely democracies have a duty to ensure the rights of their citizens. Many other mature democracies allow absentee voting of some kind, whether by mail, representative office, drop box, proxies or, less commonly, online. Although these systems are theoretically more susceptible to fraud, very little evidence of anything more than individual anomalies have been found.
Countries use a variety of security measures, such as an individualized serial number printed on each voter’s ballot like in the US. Taiwan has a wealth of experience to draw from, and plenty of bureaucratic might to pull it off.
Then again, Taiwan is not like other democracies.
When faced with a perennial adversary looking for any opportunity to interfere in its elections, the government must balance its obligation to uphold citizen rights and its duty to ensure trustworthy elections. Even with security measures, Beijing would be dedicated to finding loopholes. Taiwanese voters must wade through a plethora of meddling from across the Strait, as the latest elections made sparklingly clear. It is miraculous that Taiwan maintains credible elections, even with relentless disinformation, propaganda junket trips and vote buying.
As opponents of absentee voting say: Why fix what is not broken?
The question is a thorny one, which explains the decades-long hemming and hawing. Politicians have been calling for some form of absentee voting even before the first direct presidential election was held in 1996. The opposition party usually takes up the cause, only to hedge it again when they get in office. The cycle has started again, with new Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators last month vowing to push the issue in the name of democracy and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators reiterating the causes for concern.
Yet there might be a glimmer of hope on the horizon, again. The DPP on Thursday last week approved a bill that would allow absentee voting — but only in referendums. It also rules out voting by mail, seeking instead to only allow in-person voting from districts outside a voter’s registered residence, for which they must apply at least 60 days in advance.
The bill made rounds once in 2020, but failed to clear the legislature in time. Now, the Cabinet has proposed it again, hopefully before a more receptive audience: opposition lawmakers who only weeks before vowed to rectify this very issue.
The bill is not a remedy to Taiwan’s enfranchisement problem, but it is a start. Absentee voting only in referendums is just an attempt to run a “low stakes” trial of a solution that already has low stakes. Allowing in-person voting from different districts within Taiwan comes with little risk and great reward, making it a political no-brainer.
The greatest concern regarding absentee voting would be voting from abroad. Hopefully, the legislature could soon clear this hurdle so that it could focus on the next one, as voters are waiting.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises