The recent passing of human rights lawyer and former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator-at-large candidate Chen Chun-han (陳俊翰) has sparked widespread grief across political parties and throughout Taiwan.
After the official announcement of Chen’s death, the DPP, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) all vowed to carry on his legacy of protecting the rights of people with disabilities.
Living with spinal muscular atrophy, Chen was paralyzed from the neck down for the majority of his life. Despite the adversity, his lifelong advocacy for the availability of advanced medications had successfully attracted attention from society and raised awareness.
He became renowned as the “Taiwanese Extraordinary Attorney,” a name inspired by the South Korean TV series Extraordinary Attorney Woo, due to his unrelenting efforts.
The appearance of Chen’s name on the DPP’s list of legislator-at-large candidates in November last year triggered a wide discussion. Many people afflicted with rare diseases were optimistic that his presence in the Legislative Yuan would allow their voices to be heard and enhance the overall medical situation of the country.
Chen hoped to legislate for the construction of a more exhaustive medical insurance system for these patients, contending that the government needs to thoroughly revise the People with Disabilities Rights Protection Act (身心障礙者權益保障法). Unfortunately, Chen failed to enter the legislature to push for the necessary reforms.
Lawyer Chen’s dedication to advocating for better medical treatments was indeed impressive, which made some wonder why he decided to return to Taiwan when he could have been a well-paid lawyer in the US.
In response, he said that while he could have enjoyed adequate medical insurance coverage for his disease in the US, he aspired to improve the lives of more patients in similar circumstances by making use of the knowledge he had acquired abroad.
His altruistic character has ignited the hope of countless patients and prompted cross-party politicians to collaboratively propose relevant bills to fulfill the needs of these people.
The DPP, KMT and TPP immediately offered condolences to Chen’s family upon the announcement of his death on Feb. 15. The KMT lauded Chen’s ability to overcome his illness to obtain a double major in accounting and law, while the TPP highlighted its respect for his determination to fight for the rights of the disabled. Both parties also promised to foster social equality that will genuinely transcend physical differences.
Chen’s endeavors are widely acknowledged, but most people overlook the significant contribution of his mother, who had always been an unsung hero behind the scenes.
Since his diagnosis at the age of one, she had been by his side and taken exceptional care of his health in spite of his severe physical limitations. In appreciation of her unconditional love, Chen once said that he would not have topped his bar examination and been able to explore the world without her unwavering assistance.
Chen’s mother and her tenacity undoubtedly deserves more recognition for her son’s accomplishments.
Chen was truly a selfless warrior who managed to transform his weaknesses into incredible strength. With his constant perseverance and the infinite support of his mother, they have proven that it is possible to attain goals that seem beyond our capabilities. Hopefully, in this new legislative term, the three parties could set aside their differences and strive to collectively actualize his unfinished dream.
Tshua Siu-ui is a Taiwanese student studying international relations and politics in Norwich, England.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s