The Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India, Taiwan’s de facto embassy in that country, signed a memorandum of understanding with its Indian counterpart, the India Taipei Association, on Friday last week to pave the way for Indian migrant workers to seek employment in Taiwan.
The details of the process have yet to be agreed, but the Ministry of Labor has confirmed that, according to the memorandum, Taipei would be able to determine the number of Indian workers and which industries they could be employed in.
That is, the government is not flinging open the nation’s doors to a flood of migrant workers.
The agreement has been a long time coming, with negotiations beginning in 2020, but having to be put on hold due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
It is certain to bring many benefits to Taiwan, for a variety of reasons, although news of the plan, when announced last year, was met with a certain amount of resistance among the public.
This resistance is due in large part to misunderstandings about the need for the policy and how it is to be implemented.
It is the government’s responsibility to ensure that these misunderstandings are cleared up, and the opposition’s responsibility not to fan the flames of social tensions resulting from these misunderstandings.
It is not news that Taiwan, like so many other countries, is facing a demographic cliff, an aging society that is going to mean a gradual shrinking of the workforce and the need to bring in migrant workers to address this.
Taiwan already allows workers from Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand to seek employment in certain industries, but it has become apparent that these sources of migrant workers alone are not sufficient.
Allowing Indian workers into Taiwan, to help bolster the nation’s requirements in industries such as construction, manufacturing, domestic labor and agriculture, could go some way to remedy this situation.
Germany, Italy, France, Singapore, Malaysia and countries in the Middle East have already signed migrant worker agreements with India, and Japan and South Korea are also looking to go down this route.
There are also sound geopolitical reasons for promoting ties with New Delhi, to promote Taiwan-India relations in an international environment in which Taiwan and India share a distrust of Beijing amid its territorial ambitions.
Immigration and increasing the pool of migrant workers does have the potential to create social tensions if the public is not given access to the objective facts. During the presidential election campaign, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) said that allowing 100,000 workers coming into Taiwan would sow social tensions and take jobs away from Taiwanese.
The figure is inflated and inflammatory. It is no surprise that there was a protest in Taipei against the policy on Dec. 3 last year, during the campaign.
Unfortunately, it is also not a major surprise that this attitude toward the policy and the rhetoric of certain politicians, which Hou’s words would only have encouraged, led to negative — and unfounded — tropes about Indian migrant workers entering the debate about the issue.
Hou was criticizing government policy for political purposes during the campaign. Often, things said during an election campaign stay in the election campaign. Hou can change his tune now that the dust has settled.
The opposition needs to work with the government to refine, not hobble, this much-needed policy to ease the problem of labor shortages, improve the relations with New Delhi and help pave the way for a more prosperous and harmonious future.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS