Corporations are increasingly moving into the domain of public health. Companies such as Amazon, Google and Microsoft are being “pulled” by market opportunities for non-traditional actors to “disrupt” healthcare. Others are being “pushed” by the imperative — highlighted by events such as the COVID-19 pandemic — to act as responsible community stakeholders and help address health inequities.
When such pull and push forces intersect, there are often important opportunities to align economic and social objectives. If strategic corporate philanthropy is to improve public health, those charged with making decisions and allocating resources must have a deep understanding of the health system, including the institutions, organizations and resources that comprise it and the complex interactions among them.
Framework established by the WHO showed that health systems have six pillars: service delivery; development and deployment of a health workforce; collection, analysis and use of critical health information; provision of essential medical products, vaccines and other health technologies; financing; and effective leadership and governance. To meet a population’s health needs, all six must work in harmony, in an elaborate process involving inputs, activities, outputs, outcomes and impact.
Consider COVID-19 vaccination programs, which depend on inputs — including financial resources, workers, equipment and the vaccines themselves — that are partly outputs from activities such as medical product development and service delivery, with all the logistics, infrastructure, personnel training and supervision this entails. Together, these factors lead to an outcome — getting a large enough share of the population vaccinated — with the impact being a reduction in mortality and morbidity from COVID-19.
An effective health system is fair and equitable, in the distribution of health goods and services, and in the way it is financed, the WHO said.
It also emphasizes efficiency and cost-effectiveness and responds to the legitimate non-health expectations of those seeking healthcare, such as respect and compassion. Ultimately, an effective system ensures that anyone in need of a specific health-related good or service could access it and derive the relevant benefits.
This framework should guide corporations — and all stakeholders — as they engage in the public health domain. So should the principle that any direct investment in the health system must serve to reinforce one or more of the framework’s six pillars. To this end, a clear, data-based strategy for measuring health system performance is crucial.
Only a comprehensive monitoring and evaluating plan — identifying not only what data need to be measured, but also how, when and by whom — could ensure that decisionmakers have the information they need to plan, organize and implement effective public health programs.
For example, it could help to ascertain high and low-priority areas, as well as areas where services are being duplicated, thereby improving the allocation of scarce resources. It could also show which public health interventions are making the biggest difference and be used to track progress in health outcomes, potentially revealing gaps between segments of the population.
Organizations seeking to engage in public health could use such data — together with a broader understanding of the health system framework — to identify where they are best suited to make a difference, based on their competitive or comparative advantages. The better they know the terrain they are entering, the easier it would be to pinpoint unmet needs and anticipate their actions’ likely impact, including possible unintended consequences.
Health actors need to engage effectively with other stakeholders, because public health programs often involve diverse groups with different priorities and objectives that must be harmonized to meet overarching health goals.
However, for such engagement to work, trust and credibility are key. An effective impact measurement strategy could help here, too, by supporting transparency and accountability.
For example, while basic principles of privacy and confidentiality must be respected, organizations should share the results, positive or negative, of any public health investment or intervention — including relevant datasets, where feasible — with other stakeholders.
Beyond fostering confidence, letting others know what works and what does not would accelerate progress on improving health outcomes. Independent evaluations of programs would also help here.
All of this requires a set of key performance indicators to be established at different levels of the framework used to measure short, medium and long-term changes resulting from any given program. There is no need to reinvent the wheel. On the contrary, key performance indicators should be aligned with global standards, as established in existing policy documents, so that stakeholders are using the same language.
The final critical insight for companies entering the healthcare domain is that not only are health systems highly complex, but they also operate within an environment in which they must continually interact with various political, socioeconomic and sociocultural forces.
All of these forces — not just interactions within the health system — shape public health outcomes. The better newcomers understand these interactions, the more likely they are to have a positive effect on public health.
Tom Achoki, a former Sloan fellow at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is an adjunct faculty member at Baylor University and cofounder of the Africa Institute for Health Policy, a research and advisory agency based in Nairobi, Kenya.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) continues to bully Taiwan by conducting military drills extremely close to Taiwan in late May 2024 and announcing a legal opinion in June on how they would treat “Taiwan Independence diehards” according to the PRC’s Criminal Code. This article will describe how China’s Anaconda Strategy of psychological and legal asphyxiation is employed. The CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and Chinese Coast Guard (CCG) conducted a “punishment military exercise” against Taiwan called “Joint Sword 2024A” from 23-24 May 2024, just three days after President William Lai (賴清德) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) was sworn in and
Former US president Donald Trump’s comments that Taiwan hollowed out the US semiconductor industry are incorrect. That misunderstanding could impact the future of one of the world’s most important relationships and end up aiding China at a time it is working hard to push its own tech sector to catch up. “Taiwan took our chip business from us,” the returnee US presidential contender told Bloomberg Businessweek in an interview published this week. The remarks came after the Republican nominee was asked whether he would defend Taiwan against China. It is not the first time he has said this about the nation’s
In a recent interview with the Malaysian Chinese-language newspaper Sin Chew Daily, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) called President William Lai (賴清德) “naive.” As always with Ma, one must first deconstruct what he is saying to fully understand the parallel universe he insists on defending. Who is being “naive,” Lai or Ma? The quickest way is to confront Ma with a series of pointed questions that force him to take clear stands on the complex issues involved and prevent him from his usual ramblings. Regarding China and Taiwan, the media should first begin with questions like these: “Did the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)
The Yomiuri Shimbun, the newspaper with the largest daily circulation in Japan, on Thursday last week published an article saying that an unidentified high-ranking Japanese official openly spoke of an analysis that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) needs less than a week, not a month, to invade Taiwan with its amphibious forces. Reportedly, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has already been advised of the analysis, which was based on the PLA’s military exercises last summer. A Yomiuri analysis of unclassified satellite photographs confirmed that the PLA has already begun necessary base repairs and maintenance, and is conducting amphibious operation exercises