Due to enduring the Kafkaesque situation of having two accidents in 30 minutes, one involving an accident with an ambulance, I would like to share my personal experience. Both cases show the loopholes of Taiwanese law, which is a driving factor for the terrible traffic conditions in the nation.
I was driving my scooter on the main road in Taoyuan’s Yangmei District (楊梅). Despite there being no cars behind me, a young man in an old car made a sudden left turn and I bumped into his vehicle. At first, the man tried to run away, but was blocked by other cars. My blood and flesh started immediately to color the paving while the young man was preoccupied with his cellphone. Other people stopped, put me down and tried to stop the bleeding until the ambulance arrived a few minutes later. Some people were very helpful with first aid and traffic control — not the young man playing with his cellphone.
The ambulance drove at a low speed with flashing lights on a four-lane road. When the ambulance slowly turned left, it was hit by another scooter. It was unthinkable that the other young man could not see it. He just considered his time to be more valuable. Bleeding and in pain, I had to wait for another ambulance while the second man was keeping the first ambulance busy. Time is relative and it passes more slowly when you are bleeding and in pain.
I stayed in the hospital for three weeks, but might recover in three months. My leg was at risk even after two operations and daily painful bandage changes. My wife and kids had no life during those few weeks, because they had to come to the hospital every day. The first man was not really under pressure, and he even asked my wife if we can help him to repair his car. He told us that he has no money for damages. The second guy was never seen again.
Why can both men enjoy such stoicism? Because they simply do not face any legal or financial risks.
A person who negligently causes injury to another shall be sentenced to prison for not more than one year, short-term imprisonment, or a fine of not more than NT$100,000 under Article 284 of the Criminal Code. The first man in practice would be charged with NT$20,000 as a first-time offender. He could excuse himself by saying that he was shocked, so he made the wrong decision when he tried to run. It would be very difficult to prove that he stopped due to traffic conditions. Civil litigation is not feasible and not enforceable — he could work off the record to avoid the enforcement of a judgement. From a financial point of view, it is much better for him to object to negotiations with me, and accept the sentence of NT$20,000 to NT$30,000 instead of paying damages. Obviously, he found that advice on the Internet.
The second man? Nothing. In other countries, he might lose his driving license for a very long time. If he said that he did not see the ambulance with lights and a horn, he would prove himself to be unqualified for driving a scooter. I do not even mention his selfish and childish attitude when he prioritized saving time over the life of a person in an ambulance. Imagine if I had a heart attack or a stroke. Ten minutes could have meant life or death.
Actually, I often see drivers blocking ambulances, which is surprising for a developed country like Taiwan. It is a very developed country with nice people, but the traffic conditions are terrible and more comparable to Somalia.
There are two reasons European drivers are much better than Taiwanese drivers: Heavy fines and strict law enforcement.
Risky driving is just too expensive in Europe.
Taiwan has to increase the penalties to a level that really hurts. Cars should be seized under some circumstances. Under the current law, both men would forget the accidents soon without changing their behavior. Two people not fit for driving are still on the road and sharing their experiences with their peers. In criminal statistics, young (male) drivers are over-represented. Taiwan has to require mandatory insurance for third party damages such as loss of income and personal suffering, at least for beginners.
At the moment, the obligatory insurance burdens my medical expenses, which are mostly covered by the National Health Insurance.
Claudius Petzold is a counsel at Washington Group and Associates.
A 50-year-old on Wednesday last week died while under anesthesia at a Taipei cosmetic clinic shortly after undergoing a penis enlargement procedure. The surgeon was arrested for suspected medical malpractice, again bringing to the surface shortcomings in the regulation of cosmetic medicine. Media reports said the clinic owner and surgeon, surnamed Ting (丁), was previously convicted of negligent homicide for a postsurgical death and had been charged with coercion and aggravated assault after allegedly stopping a patient from calling for an ambulance. He had also been fined for failing inspections and had allegedly permitted people without medical licenses to assist
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
It was most annoying last week to read Chairman Xi Jinping’s (習近平) fulsome encomium to the People’s Liberation Army during the Eightieth Anniversary celebrations of victory over Japan in World War II. Comrade Xi’s soaring rhetoric was stuffed with “martyrs, sacrifice, solemnity and unwavering resolve” in praise of the “Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War.” His aspirations overflowed with “world peace” and love of the United Nations, of which China is a founding member. The Liberation Army Daily said that every word from General Secretary Xi Jinping “resounded in his powerful voice, illuminating the
An American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) spokesperson on Saturday rebuked a Chinese official for mischaracterizing World War II-era agreements as proving that Taiwan was ceded to China. The US Department of State later affirmed that the AIT remarks reflect Washington’s long-standing position: Taiwan’s political status remains undetermined and should only be resolved peacefully. The US would continue supporting Taiwan against military, economic, legal and diplomatic pressure from China, and opposes any unilateral attempt to alter the “status quo,” particularly through coercion or force, the United Daily News cited the department as saying. The remarks followed Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs
RSS