During the darkest days of World War II, as young British pilots valiantly fought the Luftwaffe over southern England and German forces prepared to invade the British Isles, then-British prime minister Winston Churchill took on the task of boosting his fellow citizens’ morale, offering them a brighter future to look forward to.
To this end, Churchill’s inspirational wartime speeches occasionally featured a poem he likely encountered at Harrow School in the late 19th century. The poem, authored by Arthur Hugh Clough, an academic who had served as an assistant to Florence Nightingale, the founder of modern nursing, urged people to reject the notion that fighting for good was futile. It concluded with the phrase: “Westward, look, the land is bright.”
Churchill, whose affinity for the US was influenced by his US-born mother, confidently asserted that the US would continue to uphold liberal democratic values in the face of the totalitarian Nazi threat. Implicit in this declaration was the hope that, if necessary, the US would come to the aid of the UK and other western European liberal democracies.
However, when we look West today, we see dark, lowering clouds on the horizon. Should former US president Donald Trump win November’s presidential election, there is no guarantee that he would defend NATO or champion liberal democratic values, as his predecessors did. Similarly, there is little hope that Ukraine could rely on his support, given that the Republican Party’s leader prefers authoritarian leaders such as Russian President Vladimir Putin to the US’ democratic allies.
For many years, “the West” has been used as a shorthand for liberal democratic societies worldwide. Historically, US presidents have served as the de facto leaders of this alliance, formal and informal, all united by shared values and principles.
However, the growing possibility of a Trump return to the White House next year calls into question the stability of this coalition.
Can the Western democratic alliance endure a US president who does not believe in free and fair elections?
Trump, who is facing four criminal indictments and 91 felony charges, appears to regard the rule of law as a means of settling scores with his critics and perceived enemies, rather than as a fundamental pillar of democratic governance. If he were to be elected, there is little doubt that his second term would put the US on the path to authoritarian rule.
As the Western and Chinese governance models compete for global dominance, a potential Trump victory could tip the balance toward the latter. In their insightful book The Political Thought of Xi Jinping, Steve Tsang (曾銳生) and Olivia Cheung say that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) does not propose an alternative to the post-war liberal international order. Instead, Xi’s strategy is rooted in his vision of China as a Leninist one-party state ruled by a single leader — himself.
Consequently, Xi’s domestic political interests consistently overshadow any notion of global responsibility. He embraces the Confucian concept of the “Mandate of Heaven,” according to which rulers derive legitimacy from divine selection, and he expects his regime to be treated with the same deference accorded to imperial China at its peak.
Moreover, Xi has repeatedly touted China’s authoritarian system as a governance model for others to emulate. He believes that when nations, particularly those in the Global South, are presented with a choice, they would find the Chinese model more attractive than Western-style democracy. This could well be the case if Trump wins in November, and heads an administration plagued by corruption and chaos.
For the liberal democratic order to endure, Western nations must defend the principles that have underpinned their success during about 80 years of relative peace and prosperity. However, it is not enough to fight for these values in Ukraine, East Asia or the Middle East; they must be upheld domestically as well. As former US ambassador to the UN Adlai Stevenson, a two-time Democratic US presidential candidate, famously said: “We cannot be any stronger in our foreign policy — for all the bombs and guns we may heap up in our arsenals — than we are in the spirit which rules inside the country.”
Trump clearly does not share this sentiment, and neither do his fellow Republicans, almost all of whom seem to have forsaken their principles or, at the very least, concealed them to save their own political futures. Those of us who live outside the US and admire its achievements and founding principles pray that Americans make the right choice when they cast their ballots in November. Then, and only then, could we be able to declare, with the same confidence as Churchill: “Westward, look, the land is bright.”
Chris Patten, the last British governor of Hong Kong and a former EU commissioner for external affairs, is chancellor of the University of Oxford and the author of The Hong Kong Diaries.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
With each passing day, the threat of a People’s Republic of China (PRC) assault on Taiwan grows. Whatever one’s view about the history, there is essentially no question that a PRC conquest of Taiwan would mark the end of the autonomy and freedom enjoyed by the island’s 23 million people. Simply put, the PRC threat to Taiwan is genuinely existential for a free, democratic and autonomous Taiwan. Yet one might not know it from looking at Taiwan. For an island facing a threat so acute, lethal and imminent, Taiwan is showing an alarming lack of urgency in dramatically strengthening its defenses.
As India’s six-week-long general election grinds past the halfway mark, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s messaging has shifted from confident to shrill. After the first couple of phases of polling showed a 3 percentage point drop in turnout, Modi and his party leaders have largely stopped promoting their accomplishments of the past 10 years — or, for that matter, the “Modi guarantees” offered in the Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) manifesto for the next five. Instead, making the majority Hindu population fear and loathe Muslims seems to be the BJP’s preferred talking point. Modi went on the offensive in an April 21
The people of Taiwan recently received confirmation of the strength of American support for their security. Of four foreign aid bills that Congress passed and President Biden signed in April, the bill legislating additional support for Taiwan garnered the most votes. Three hundred eighty-five members of the House of Representatives voted to provide foreign military financing to Taiwan versus only 34 against. More members of Congress voted to support Taiwan than Ukraine, Israel, or banning TikTok. There was scant debate over whether the United States should provide greater support for Taiwan. It was understood and broadly accepted that doing so
I still remember the first time I heard about the possibility of an invasion by China. I was six years old. I thought war was coming and hid in my bed, scared. After 18 years, the invasion news tastes like a sandwich I eat every morning. As a Gen Z Taiwanese student who has witnessed China’s harassment for more than 20 years, I want to share my opinion on China. Every generation goes through different events. I have seen not only the norms of China’s constant presence, but also the Sunflower movement, wars and people fighting over peace or equality,