While I have always appreciated European observation and commentaries on Taiwanese politics as they foster the necessary flow of ideas to sustain a robust democracy and a resilient civil society, the op-ed written by Marcin Jerzewski and Jakub Janda (“Legislative speaker matters for EU,” Jan. 31, page 8) was not one of them. They made questionable assertions about the functioning of Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) politicians.
As a Taiwanese educated in France, I have been showered, by my European friends with sincere care for and unwavering attention to Taiwanese domestic politics and cross-strait relations. I can attest from my own personal experience that Europe is undoubtedly a close, like-minded partner of Taiwan. We are thankful, from the bottom of our hearts, for the friendship we have developed over the years.
As Jerzewski and Janda correctly noted, KMT Legislator Johnny Chiang (江啟臣), while he was chairman of the KMT, engaged in high-level and high-profile interactions with diplomats from European countries. I staffed Chiang’s speaker event with EU Representative to Taiwan Filip Grzegorzewski at the National Policy Foundation in Taipei when I worked as project assistant for the KMT Department of International Affairs.
KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) is also committed to expanding our relations with Europe. Representatives from 12 European countries joined the KMT in our National Day Celebration last year.
However, the accuracy of Jerzewski and Janda’s article stopped there.
KMT Legislator-at-large Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜), while running as the KMT’s presidential candidate in the 2020 election, vowed to pursue balanced external relations. He recognized the importance of befriending important stakeholders of Indo-Pacific security, including the US, China and Hong Kong.
Han met with the head of Liaison Office of the Central People’s Government and director of the Taiwan Affairs Office during his trip to Hong Kong, as he met with then-chair of the American Institute in Taiwan James Moriarty when the latter was in Taipei. None of the meeting minutes were published because of their sensitive nature. That did not make Han a “China appeaser” nor render his meetings in Hong Kong “secretive” in any way.
Former deputy minister for mainland affairs Chang Hsien-yao (張顯耀) said that Control Yuan President Chen Chu (陳菊) did not consult the Mainland Affairs Council either when, as the mayor of Kaohsiung, met with then-Taiwan Affairs Office director Zhang Zhijun (張志軍) in Tianjin in 2013. Was her meeting secretive, by Jerzewski and Janda’s standard, too?
Han’s lack of a strong international profile is not a problem. Having someone with a stronger domestic policy background leading the legislature, which is far from uncommon, has never been a problem for any other legislature around the world.
The KMT’s international affairs experts in Taipei have my full confidence in getting Han up to speed for his future international affairs portfolio.
I can still recall similar criticisms leveled against New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) before he made his trip to the US in September last year. The baseless comments became practically extinct after his successful US trip. Certainly, the legislative speaker has an instrumental role in Taiwanese parliamentary diplomacy. However, just as in any other legislatures around the world, the speaker’s most crucial function is to ensure legislative progress and to be willing to reach across the aisle to form cross-partisan consensus, as clearly demonstrated in Han’s meeting with Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators-at-large, including his former harsh critic, Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌).
Just as any other legislatures around the world, the Legislative Yuan has the right to elect its presiding officer, which is a critical component of the country’s constitutional design to prevent executive abuse of power. The legislative speaker and deputy speaker exercise their power in accordance with the regulations in place; any electee regardless of their political party should forgo past personal convictions and should facilitate Taiwan’s democratic processes in the legislature to its fullest.
Han won the KMT’s nomination and the speakership election fair and square, and would act in accordance with the principle of administrative neutrality.
The conduct of parliamentary diplomacy is well within the discretion of the speaker and co-conveners of the legislature’s Foreign Relations and National Defense Committee. There is no evidence whatsoever to support the claim that executive-legislative tensions would “have a detrimental effect on the efficiency of Taiwan’s parliamentary diplomacy,” as far as parliamentary diplomacy is concerned.
The only way it would produce said effect is if the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and its missions overseas decline to assist parliamentary delegations traveling abroad. In that case, it would still not be because of Han’s lack of international affairs experience or his disagreement with the executive branch on foreign policy, but because of the Democratic Progressive Party’s biases against Han.
Jerzewski and Janda’s questionable assertions against Han’s qualifications for the speakership are unfounded, if not outright misleading. It is unfortunate they opted for outdated red scare rhetoric to lead the Taipei Times’ international audience into forming incorrect perceptions about the KMT and its politicians. They went as far as to suggest European politicians would decide to intervene in Taiwan’s domestic affairs upon Han’s election as speaker. I am sure Europe is interested in working with whoever is at the top of the legislature. We invite all those concerned to consult with the KMT.
Han is our legislative speaker. We stand with him.
Howard Shen is assistant director of international affairs for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has long been a cornerstone of US foreign policy, advancing not only humanitarian aid but also the US’ strategic interests worldwide. The abrupt dismantling of USAID under US President Donald Trump ‘s administration represents a profound miscalculation with dire consequences for global influence, particularly in the Indo-Pacific. By withdrawing USAID’s presence, Washington is creating a vacuum that China is eager to fill, a shift that will directly weaken Taiwan’s international position while emboldening Beijing’s efforts to isolate Taipei. USAID has been a crucial player in countering China’s global expansion, particularly in regions where
US President Donald Trump has gotten off to a head-spinning start in his foreign policy. He has pressured Denmark to cede Greenland to the United States, threatened to take over the Panama Canal, urged Canada to become the 51st US state, unilaterally renamed the Gulf of Mexico to “the Gulf of America” and announced plans for the United States to annex and administer Gaza. He has imposed and then suspended 25 percent tariffs on Canada and Mexico for their roles in the flow of fentanyl into the United States, while at the same time increasing tariffs on China by 10
With the manipulations of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), it is no surprise that this year’s budget plan would make government operations difficult. The KMT and the TPP passing malicious legislation in the past year has caused public ire to accumulate, with the pressure about to erupt like a volcano. Civic groups have successively backed recall petition drives and public consensus has reached a fever-pitch, with no let up during the long Lunar New Year holiday. The ire has even breached the mindsets of former staunch KMT and TPP supporters. Most Taiwanese have vowed to use
Despite the steady modernization of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA), the international community is skeptical of its warfare capabilities. Late last month, US think tank RAND Corp published two reports revealing the PLA’s two greatest hurdles: personnel challenges and structural difficulties. The first RAND report, by Jennie W. Wenger, titled Factors Shaping the Future of China’s Military, analyzes the PLA’s obstacles with recruitment, stating that China has long been committed to attracting young talent from top universities to augment the PLA’s modernization needs. However, the plan has two major constraints: demographic changes and the adaptability of the PLA’s military culture.