Constitutional frameworks
A distinction between Taiwanese self-determination on the one hand, and the Republic of China (ROC) Constitution on the other, was revealed by how president-elect William Lai’s (賴清德) post-election speech was translated into English (“Presidential Election: Lai’s victory sparks jubilation,” Jan. 14, page 1). The interpreter first said: “I will act in accordance with our democratic and free constitutional order,” but this was soon corrected to “the ROC constitutional framework.”
The former wording was hardly a slip of the tongue. A touchstone for defensive democracy in constitutional law is the term of art “freiheitliche demokratische Grundordnung” (自由民主憲政秩序 or liberal democratic basic order) pioneered by the German Basic Law (“Ko’s latest proposal a non-starter for Kinmen,” Sept. 16, 2023, page 8).
In Taiwan, this phrase (自由民主憲政秩序) appeared in Constitutional Interpretation No. 499 (March 24, 2000), a case about amending the constitution (“National Assembly reforms debated,” April 2, 2000, page 3; additionally, “Ma’s idea of National Day has no basis in law,” Oct. 13, 2022, page 8). It connotes an aspiration to the universal principle of self-determination through democracy and the rule of law.
The latter wording was no coincidence either. The Chinese Civil War framing relegates Taiwan to a domestic affair for China and dissuades international intervention. That is why it has been championed by both Chinese parties — the Chinese Communist Party in China and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in Taiwan, as Li Thian-hok (李天福) pointed out as early as 1958 (“Book review: A Taiwan Advocate in the US,” Aug. 27, 2020, page 14). That is also why, when President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was first elected eight years ago, Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) demanded that she respect “their own constitution” (“China’s mention of ROC Constitution no landmark: academic,” March 1, 2016, page 3).
The Tsai administration strengthened international support for Taiwan while keeping to the ROC constitutional “status quo” by emphasizing that neither side of the Taiwan Strait is subordinate to the other. It remains to be seen how president-elect Lai, the pragmatic worker for Taiwan’s independence, will navigate this terrain.
Te Khai-su
Helsinki, Finland
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS