China’s true colors
Last month, the Chinese Customs Tariff Commission announced that starting from Jan. 1, preferential tariffs on 12 petrochemical products established by the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement would be suspended. Chinese officials have indicated that preferential tariffs related to agriculture and fisheries, machine and vehicle parts, and textiles might also be revoked.
In the face of China’s economic coercion, a great number of Taiwanese businesspeople have already shifted their focus to the Southeast Asian market. Although these enterprises are affected by Beijing’s move, Taiwan clearly has rid itself of its entire dependence on the Chinese market. The New Southbound Policy has helped Taiwanese businesspeople be more flexible. The government’s goal of diversifying trade has been gradually realized.
On the other hand, China insists on controlling its market in a conventional way. Beijing tries to attract developing countries to its side by providing some incentives, derived from China’s internal market.
However, the truth is that for some countries that have participated in China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), their economies soon collapsed.BRI contracts are fundamentally unequal treaties. China is an egoistic country and even more selfish than the West. Beijing has no sympathy for others.
China has suspended preferential tariffs, but this would not pose a major threat to Taiwan’s economy. Instead, Beijing’s move has in some ways helped Taiwanese confirm that economic decoupling from China is the right thing to do. The government has been exploring the Southeast Asian market in Vietnam, Thailand and India. As Taiwan continues to confront China’s unreasonable economic sanctions, the government must offer more precautionary measures to lower the risk for small and medium-sized enterprises. That way, officials and businesspeople can be prepared and collaborate to deal with upcoming problems.
Lin Che-yu
Taipei
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers