China’s true colors
Last month, the Chinese Customs Tariff Commission announced that starting from Jan. 1, preferential tariffs on 12 petrochemical products established by the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement would be suspended. Chinese officials have indicated that preferential tariffs related to agriculture and fisheries, machine and vehicle parts, and textiles might also be revoked.
In the face of China’s economic coercion, a great number of Taiwanese businesspeople have already shifted their focus to the Southeast Asian market. Although these enterprises are affected by Beijing’s move, Taiwan clearly has rid itself of its entire dependence on the Chinese market. The New Southbound Policy has helped Taiwanese businesspeople be more flexible. The government’s goal of diversifying trade has been gradually realized.
On the other hand, China insists on controlling its market in a conventional way. Beijing tries to attract developing countries to its side by providing some incentives, derived from China’s internal market.
However, the truth is that for some countries that have participated in China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), their economies soon collapsed.BRI contracts are fundamentally unequal treaties. China is an egoistic country and even more selfish than the West. Beijing has no sympathy for others.
China has suspended preferential tariffs, but this would not pose a major threat to Taiwan’s economy. Instead, Beijing’s move has in some ways helped Taiwanese confirm that economic decoupling from China is the right thing to do. The government has been exploring the Southeast Asian market in Vietnam, Thailand and India. As Taiwan continues to confront China’s unreasonable economic sanctions, the government must offer more precautionary measures to lower the risk for small and medium-sized enterprises. That way, officials and businesspeople can be prepared and collaborate to deal with upcoming problems.
Lin Che-yu
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS