Online talk show The Night Night Show with Hello (賀瓏夜夜秀) sparked controversy with an episode aired on Monday, in which guest Wang Zhian (王志安), a Chinese journalist who lives in Tokyo after being blacklisted by Beijing, ridiculed the posture and gestures of Chen Chun-han (陳俊翰), a Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislator-at-large candidate and human rights lawyer who has spinal muscular atrophy.
When asked about his thoughts on Taiwan’s elections by the show’s host, Wang said the parties’ election rallies felt like variety shows that have performers, arranged plots and “even pushed disabled people onto the stage to rouse sympathy,” before mimicking Chen and chanting: “Support the DPP.”
The host’s and audience’s laughter in response to Wang’s remark stirred public anger and drew condemnation from politicians and public figures, and companies withdrew their sponsorship from the show. As a result, a producer of the show named Hawkins (霍金) on Wednesday apologized to Chen and to viewers for what he called the production oversight.
However, Wang initially refused to apologize, saying on social media that the DPP used disabled people as an election tool and it is the “green communist” party that is putting pressure on the talk show to apologize. Wang later said he is willing to apologize to Chen in person if he felt offended, but still condemns the DPP for its actions.
The National Immigration Agency on Wednesday said it received many complaints about Wang’s behavior and confirmed that his appearence on the talk show breached the terms of his one-year multiple entry tourist visa for Chinese citizens, so Wang is to be banned from re-entering Taiwan on a short-term tourist visa for five years.
Wang said on social media that the DPP is carrying out retributive punishment against him and he called it the “democratic communist party.”
On Friday he uploaded a YouTube video saying he apologizes to Chen and all disabled people in Taiwan, and for the trouble he caused the talk show.
He also apologized to the DPP, but many said he was being sarcastic, as Wang said: “The DPP represents Taiwan’s democracy and public opinion.”
Wang failed to realize that the backlash and condemnation he received from the public is mainly against his disrespectful attitude toward people with disabilities and him seeing them as “tools” without individual subjectivity, and thus being “taken advantage of” by the DPP for electoral purposes.
He also said in his apology video that he had assumed Taiwan would tolerate a larger range of topics being talked about.
Wang failed to learn that even in a democratic society, freedom of expression still comes with some restrictions in cases such as spreading disinformation or inciting discrimination, hostility or violence.
Although his remarks did not breach a specific law, it offended Taiwan’s sense of nondiscrimination. He has been called out for it and the show has been boycotted by many, but he is not being punished for his criticism of a party.
Moreover, Wang also misunderstood or intentionally distorted why his tourist visa was revoked. It was because he violated the Regulations Governing the Approval of People of the Mainland Area Visiting Taiwan for Purposes of Tourism (大陸地區人民來台從事觀光活動許可辦法) by engaging in “work,” including journalism and appearing on a political talk show.
While Wang is trying to politicize the incident, acting as if he is being punished for his remarks against the DPP, Taiwanese should not be fooled. As politicians have shown a rare unity across party lines by speaking out against Wang’s disrespectful remark, the incident could hopefully cause some people to reflect on their discriminative attitude toward people with disabilities or special needs.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS