Absentee voting not secure
Yesterday, a letter to the editor written by a Mr David Pendery was published in the Taipei Times, arguing about the benefits of absentee voting, no matter in which country a Taiwanese citizen and prospective voter might reside.
In his letter Pendery states that “There is no reason that all of these votes from citizens of Taiwan, wherever they live, would not be ‘certifiable and trustworthy,’” even if they would reside in China.
Pendery does not provide any supporting facts or arguments for why absentee votes cast in China would be “certifiable and trustworthy.” It would be most welcome if Mr Pendery would provide such insights to inform the rest of us.
Methods to cast ballots in elections in a country other than the nation in question include voting in person at an embassy or a consulate, sending a letter, using fax, e-mail or by accessing a Web site portal for some US states and express courier service.
Taiwan does not have any consular services or embassies in China. Letters, faxes and express courier services are subject to screening, and the Internet in China is monitored by design.
To be eligible to vote, registration is required and this registration is undertaken in the foreign country of residence. This is also done by the same or similar means used to cast a ballot.
None of these methods are tamper-proof.
Since it is very much in China’s interest to interfere in Taiwan’s elections, does anyone believe that the Chinese Communist Party would abstain from this opportunity to influence the outcome of an election in Taiwan?
It is in the interest of democracy to encourage and make it easier for all citizens to exercise their right to vote. In some democratic countries it is not only a right, but also an obligation. When it comes to digital voting, most countries agree that although it presents certain advantages by making it easier to vote, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. Due to the inherent risk that comes with any Internet-connected device, a ballot cast using this method cannot be considered “certifiable and trustworthy.” When it comes to absentee voting in China, no vote could be considered as such.
If Mr Pendery could argue otherwise, he would be most welcome to present this information in this paper.
The subject and the discussion are valid and necessary, to assess whether absentee ballots could be accepted from China or not. My opinion is that they cannot because they cannot be validated beyond doubt.
The facts regarding absentee voting methods, combined with China’s election interference interest and the inherent risk of tampering, deliberately built into China’s surveillance system, support this understanding.
The most important principle for exercising democracy is being able to cast one’s vote without undue influence and according to one’s own will. There are no such possibilities in China.
Jan Nilsson
Singapore
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS