Absentee voting not secure
Yesterday, a letter to the editor written by a Mr David Pendery was published in the Taipei Times, arguing about the benefits of absentee voting, no matter in which country a Taiwanese citizen and prospective voter might reside.
In his letter Pendery states that “There is no reason that all of these votes from citizens of Taiwan, wherever they live, would not be ‘certifiable and trustworthy,’” even if they would reside in China.
Pendery does not provide any supporting facts or arguments for why absentee votes cast in China would be “certifiable and trustworthy.” It would be most welcome if Mr Pendery would provide such insights to inform the rest of us.
Methods to cast ballots in elections in a country other than the nation in question include voting in person at an embassy or a consulate, sending a letter, using fax, e-mail or by accessing a Web site portal for some US states and express courier service.
Taiwan does not have any consular services or embassies in China. Letters, faxes and express courier services are subject to screening, and the Internet in China is monitored by design.
To be eligible to vote, registration is required and this registration is undertaken in the foreign country of residence. This is also done by the same or similar means used to cast a ballot.
None of these methods are tamper-proof.
Since it is very much in China’s interest to interfere in Taiwan’s elections, does anyone believe that the Chinese Communist Party would abstain from this opportunity to influence the outcome of an election in Taiwan?
It is in the interest of democracy to encourage and make it easier for all citizens to exercise their right to vote. In some democratic countries it is not only a right, but also an obligation. When it comes to digital voting, most countries agree that although it presents certain advantages by making it easier to vote, the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. Due to the inherent risk that comes with any Internet-connected device, a ballot cast using this method cannot be considered “certifiable and trustworthy.” When it comes to absentee voting in China, no vote could be considered as such.
If Mr Pendery could argue otherwise, he would be most welcome to present this information in this paper.
The subject and the discussion are valid and necessary, to assess whether absentee ballots could be accepted from China or not. My opinion is that they cannot because they cannot be validated beyond doubt.
The facts regarding absentee voting methods, combined with China’s election interference interest and the inherent risk of tampering, deliberately built into China’s surveillance system, support this understanding.
The most important principle for exercising democracy is being able to cast one’s vote without undue influence and according to one’s own will. There are no such possibilities in China.
Jan Nilsson
Singapore
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
The arrest in France of Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov has brought into sharp focus one of the major conflicts of our age. On one hand, we want privacy in our digital lives, which is why we like the kind of end-to-end encryption Telegram promises. On the other, we want the government to be able to stamp out repugnant online activities — such as child pornography or terrorist plotting. The reality is that we cannot have our cake and eat it, too. Durov last month was charged with complicity in crimes taking place on the app, including distributing child pornography,
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
RSS