The Marshall Islands and Tuvalu have reaffirmed their ties with Taiwan, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said on Monday, dispelling a rumor that Tuvalu might switch official diplomatic ties to Beijing.
The rumor, which came from an Australian publication’s interview with Tuvaluan Ambassador to Taiwan Bikenibeu Paeniu, suggested that Tuvalu would follow Nauru’s switching of ties from Taipei to Beijing. Nauru severed ties with Taipei on Sunday last week after the election of president-elect William Lai (賴清德), in an act widely seen as coercion by Beijing against Taiwan’s ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
It is good that the Marshall Islands and Tuvalu would choose to remain Taiwan’s allies, but not for the recognition of Taiwan’s sovereignty that this relationship affords. China has used its poaching of Taiwan’s allies to pressure the DPP, and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is highly critical of the DPP whenever an ally severs ties. In particular, KMT officials have used the severances as a basis for criticism of the administration of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who has refused to accept China’s so-called “1992 consensus” — a tacit agreement between the KMT and Beijing that there is only “one China.”
Arguably, the KMT’s criticisms of Tsai in these instances amounts to collusion with the Chinese Communist Party, as could be said of some KMT candidates’ comments while campaigning in this year’s general elections, when they said that a vote for the DPP would be a vote for war with China.
If a friend is easily bought off by one’s enemy, then they were never a friend to begin with. Many of the former allies that severed ties with Taiwan over Tsai’s eight years in office were countries that could not offer good economic or military partnerships. They might have spoken up for Taiwan’s inclusion in UN organizations, but they often demanded hefty financial sums in return. There was little substance to these largely symbolic relationships, and they cost Taiwan’s taxpayers.
Taiwan must focus on fostering mutually beneficial relationships, regardless of their official nature. Taiwan has increased trade with Japan, Southeast Asian countries, the US and the EU. It has also ramped up academic and other exchanges, and opened Mandarin language schools in the US, the UK, France, Germany and elsewhere.
Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation and George H.W. Bush Foundation for US-China Relations research fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times op-ed article published on Dec. 29 last year underscored the importance of Taiwan continuing to seek closer ties with India and other countries concerned over Chinese aggression. India began rethinking its relationship with China following border skirmishes and is more receptive to Taiwan due to measures such as the New Southbound Policy, she wrote.
“Taiwan’s proactive approach became especially significant amid the concurrent decline in relations with China, which created a strategic window for Taiwan when China was constraining its international presence,” she wrote.
Japanese leaders have also increasingly expressed interest in closer ties with Taiwan due to perceived threats from China, and EU leaders have increasingly re-evaluated ties with China over trade imbalances and questions over its support for Russia’s war in Ukraine.
“It would be paramount for [Taiwan’s] incoming president to maintain the momentum achieved on the foreign policy front, especially considering the cautious approach adopted by countries toward Taiwan in the past,” Hashmi wrote.
Countries interested in ties with Taiwan still have disproportionate trade ties favoring China. Many countries seek to “de-risk” these ties, and Taiwan could play a key role, but it must proactively encourage countries to take risks involved with establishing closer ties. The more countries that distance themselves from China, the less threatening it becomes, and Taiwan should actively encourage that trend.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS