A ‘yes’ to absentee voting
The Taipei Times has reported that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has proposed a bill to introduce absentee voting in Taiwan, and the Taiwan People’s Party has also endorsed this move (“KMT legislators eye absentee voting proposals,” Jan. 25, page 1). This deserves a fair hearing.
The allowance for mail-in voting (or simply voting by way of drop boxes, as well as electronic voting) allows for voting outside of any sort of “household registration” requirement in alignment with the place one lives or was born.
To be sure this idea “would help deepen the nation’s democracy” as KMT Legislator Lai Shyh-bao (賴士葆) said, with such a move improving voter turnout, not only those who live in remote areas or have other difficulty accessing polls, but also those who are unable to vote because they cannot return to their home districts (often simply due to employment requirements). Most important would be the ability of Taiwanese living abroad to vote. These people are, after all, citizens of this nation and they should have the right to participate in elections, wherever they live. Such a policy is seen as a norm in many nations.
The US has had absentee voting since as far back as the US Civil War and it is seen as the model nowadays. I myself have voted as an absentee in Taiwan in every US federal election since 2000, and it has been a great honor to be able to do this.
Not every nation allows for absentee voting, but it can be seen as a “trending issue among democratic countries worldwide,” as KMT legislator-elect Sean Liao (廖偉翔) said.
It is a thoroughly modern, and entirely inclusive methodology, and should be adopted by Taiwan as soon as possible. The nation should not lag behind on this issue.
In the article, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) seems hesitant about this development, and to say that simply “believing” in election results is enough would not do. Taiwanese should introduce “new mechanisms to increase the number of voters.” As noted it is a global democratic inclination.
Drawing in the bulk of all eligible Taiwanese voters to elections should be seen as the new normal.
Needless to say, Taiwanese who live in free, democratic nations should be allowed to vote, while the DPP claims that Taiwanese living in China would be unduly and negatively influenced by Chinese intervention seems at best a long shot. There is no reason that all of these votes from citizens of Taiwan, wherever they live, would not be “certifiable and trustworthy.”
If 2 million more Taiwanese could be given the right to vote with this policy, as the article states, that could only be a positive development for democracy in Taiwan, and let us hope we can see this soon.
David Pendery
Taipei
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS