In 2020, then-US president Donald Trump said that, for national security reasons, the TikTok social media platform must be shut down or sold by its Chinese parent company, ByteDance. Some members of the US Congress proposed a complete ban on TikTok in the US.
In the same year, India completely banned TikTok, citing risks to national security and privacy.
Immediately after the presidential and legislative elections in Taiwan on Jan. 13, rumors about vote rigging started spreading on TikTok. Anyone who believed such rubbish clearly does not realize that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party run some regions. Why would the election commissions in such municipalities or counties — or even administrative regions within them — rig the vote in favor of the Democratic Progressive Party?
As the saying goes, “rumors stop at the ears of the wise,” but because there are so few wise people, “a lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.”
The Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) infiltration and theft of secrets in Taiwan are no less than in the US. Just look at how many spies have stolen military secrets for the CCP. The US and other democratic countries are already well aware that TikTok is corroding their citizens’ spirits and democratic values, especially the souls of young people.
The “clear and present danger” standard for censorship of free speech, as established by then-US Supreme Court associate justice Oliver Holmes in 1919, faces new challenges. There were no televisions or mobile phones in 1919, let alone the brainwashing, pollution and penetration of TikTok. Moreover, there are exceptions to freedom of speech, such as incitement, false statements, obscenity, child pornography and intimidation.
The US was slow to discover the harm that TikTok posed to its data security and national security, despite it having been a clear and present danger for a long time.
China is a potential and existing enemy of Taiwan. TikTok’s role in spreading disinformation and rumors is an open secret. The damage it does to Taiwan’s democratic values and the risk it poses of leaking personal information have long been a clear and present danger.
Furthermore, TikTok could be restricted just on the grounds of making false statements.
As TikTok does not have a branch company in Taiwan, the authorities here cannot directly control and restrict it, but it cannot be allowed to spread rumors at will and behave as a legal spy.
Apart from banning the use of TikTok in the public sector, the government should follow the precedent of other countries and completely ban the app.
This is no longer an issue of freedom of speech, but one that affects personal information, the public interest, democratic values and national security.
Provisions of Article 23 of the Constitution say that such issues are subject to legal redress. The only problem is that there are many CCP fellow travelers and spies across Taiwan, including in the Legislative Yuan.
Legislative or policy restrictions on the use of TikTok would lure the snake out of its hole so that the public can see the true faces of these people and parties.
If no action is taken, the situation will be “if TikTok is not shut down, Taiwan will be shut down by TikTok.”
Chuang Sheng-rong is a lawyer.
Translated by Julian Clegg
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS