There has been a lot of international news commentary about Taiwan’s presidential election and its implications for cross-strait relations and security issues in the Indo-Pacific region. However, less has been discussed about the significance of the legislative election for women’s inclusion and representation in Taiwan.
This time, Taiwan elected a second female vice president, after electing and re-electing President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) as the first female president in 2016 and 2020. The legislative election on the same day set an impressive record for women’s representation, with 47 women elected out of 113 members of the legislature, constituting 41.59 percent of the seats. That is comparable to the 48 female lawmakers in the outgoing 10th Legislative Yuan.
This achievement continues to position Taiwan as a global leader in women’s political participation. The global average for women’s representation in legislative bodies is 26.7 percent and Taiwan’s accomplishment exceeds both the global average and the Asian average of 21.3 percent. Taiwan would have been ranked 26th worldwide as of last month if the Inter-Parliamentary Union included Taiwan in its monthly ranking of women’s share in parliaments.
Taiwan boasts a significantly higher percentage than South Korea (19.1 percent, ranked 122nd) and Japan (10.3 percent, ranked 166th). The fact that Taiwan is the first nation in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage should also be noted.
My analysis of the election results reveals that out of the 310 candidates running for district seats, 106 were women and 204 were men. Interestingly, the difference in success rates between female and male candidates was not statistically significant, suggesting that women were just as likely to win as their male counterparts.
Male and female candidates from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) had a similar success rate of 52 percent. The male success rate was slightly higher than female rate among Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidates (58 percent versus 52.38 percent), although this difference was not statistically significant.
Examining the impact of incumbency on election outcomes, 28 female members from the current Legislative Yuan and 37 current male members vied for district seats, constituting 21 percent of the total candidates. Again, the re-election rates for incumbent women (71.43 percent) and men (70.27 percent) were similar. Of the 73 districts, 20 are to continue to be represented by female representatives, while nine are to transition from a female to a male representative, and six experience the reverse.
Legislators-at-large, accounting for 34 seats, witnessed the return of four women and five men from the 10th Legislative Yuan, all affiliated with the DPP. Three women and three men secured seats for the Lowland and Highland Aborigine constituencies, with one female legislator being re-elected.
Taiwan’s legislative election marks a continuously significant stride toward women’s representation and inclusion in the legislature. The fact that female candidates were equally competitive in their bids for district seats is notable.
Nathan Batto, a professor at Academia Sinica, has previously showed that a gender quota at the local level has increased women’s representation at that level, and they continue to win national-level non-quota Legislative Yuan seats. On the other hand, national-level legislators-at-large mostly do not succeed at getting elected to district-level seats.
National Taiwan University political science professor Huang Chang-ling (黃長玲) has shown that more than half of female legislators-at-large who served between 2008 and 2012 left politics after their term was over, compared with 30 percent of their male counterparts. In this election, only three female legislators-at-large ran in district elections and none won a seat. It is important to encourage and support legislators-at-large to continue their political careers by leveraging their political experience rather than merely relying on them to attract votes.
Taiwan is the first nation to hold major elections this year. I hope Taiwan sets a global example not only for its transparent and democratic elections, but also for the high level of gender equality in government. Beyond the numbers, Taiwan must continue making politics more inclusive and diverse by passing more bills to achieve substantive gender equality.
Lee Young-Im is an associate professor of political science at California State University, Sacramento, and a 2024 Ministry of Foreign Affairs Taiwan Fellow.
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS