There has been a lot of international news commentary about Taiwan’s presidential election and its implications for cross-strait relations and security issues in the Indo-Pacific region. However, less has been discussed about the significance of the legislative election for women’s inclusion and representation in Taiwan.
This time, Taiwan elected a second female vice president, after electing and re-electing President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) as the first female president in 2016 and 2020. The legislative election on the same day set an impressive record for women’s representation, with 47 women elected out of 113 members of the legislature, constituting 41.59 percent of the seats. That is comparable to the 48 female lawmakers in the outgoing 10th Legislative Yuan.
This achievement continues to position Taiwan as a global leader in women’s political participation. The global average for women’s representation in legislative bodies is 26.7 percent and Taiwan’s accomplishment exceeds both the global average and the Asian average of 21.3 percent. Taiwan would have been ranked 26th worldwide as of last month if the Inter-Parliamentary Union included Taiwan in its monthly ranking of women’s share in parliaments.
Taiwan boasts a significantly higher percentage than South Korea (19.1 percent, ranked 122nd) and Japan (10.3 percent, ranked 166th). The fact that Taiwan is the first nation in Asia to legalize same-sex marriage should also be noted.
My analysis of the election results reveals that out of the 310 candidates running for district seats, 106 were women and 204 were men. Interestingly, the difference in success rates between female and male candidates was not statistically significant, suggesting that women were just as likely to win as their male counterparts.
Male and female candidates from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) had a similar success rate of 52 percent. The male success rate was slightly higher than female rate among Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidates (58 percent versus 52.38 percent), although this difference was not statistically significant.
Examining the impact of incumbency on election outcomes, 28 female members from the current Legislative Yuan and 37 current male members vied for district seats, constituting 21 percent of the total candidates. Again, the re-election rates for incumbent women (71.43 percent) and men (70.27 percent) were similar. Of the 73 districts, 20 are to continue to be represented by female representatives, while nine are to transition from a female to a male representative, and six experience the reverse.
Legislators-at-large, accounting for 34 seats, witnessed the return of four women and five men from the 10th Legislative Yuan, all affiliated with the DPP. Three women and three men secured seats for the Lowland and Highland Aborigine constituencies, with one female legislator being re-elected.
Taiwan’s legislative election marks a continuously significant stride toward women’s representation and inclusion in the legislature. The fact that female candidates were equally competitive in their bids for district seats is notable.
Nathan Batto, a professor at Academia Sinica, has previously showed that a gender quota at the local level has increased women’s representation at that level, and they continue to win national-level non-quota Legislative Yuan seats. On the other hand, national-level legislators-at-large mostly do not succeed at getting elected to district-level seats.
National Taiwan University political science professor Huang Chang-ling (黃長玲) has shown that more than half of female legislators-at-large who served between 2008 and 2012 left politics after their term was over, compared with 30 percent of their male counterparts. In this election, only three female legislators-at-large ran in district elections and none won a seat. It is important to encourage and support legislators-at-large to continue their political careers by leveraging their political experience rather than merely relying on them to attract votes.
Taiwan is the first nation to hold major elections this year. I hope Taiwan sets a global example not only for its transparent and democratic elections, but also for the high level of gender equality in government. Beyond the numbers, Taiwan must continue making politics more inclusive and diverse by passing more bills to achieve substantive gender equality.
Lee Young-Im is an associate professor of political science at California State University, Sacramento, and a 2024 Ministry of Foreign Affairs Taiwan Fellow.
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.