While more than 50 countries made congratulatory calls to president-elect William Lai (賴清德) over the weekend, with many international media outlets lauding Taiwan’s elections as “transparent,” an Internet celebrity seemed to hold a different view.
YouTuber Alisasa posted unverified videos from social media such as Douyin and TikTok, showing election staff counting the votes, seemingly “rigging” the results. As Alisasa was a supporter of Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman and presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), her posts accusing the Central Election Commission of election corruption went viral among the “little grass” — the nickname for TPP supporters — triggering outrage and disgust.
When the Taiwan FactCheck Center investigated and cleared up the disinformation, Alisasa deleted the posts and apologized for her “bad choice of words” — but not for her actions. Even Ko said “it is impossible to conduct large-scale rigging in Taiwan.”
While Taiwan is a democracy that protects freedom of speech, there is an uncrossable line. Alisasa’s videos are a classic example of China’s relentless cognitive warfare against Taiwan. Before election day, similar blatantly flawed videos were circulating, meant to persuade Taiwanese that democracy is not worth safeguarding. With the presidential election over, vilifying the vote counting as “flawed” without evidence not only shows oneself to be a bad sport, but hurls a great insult at election workers, the public and election integrity.
The incident shows that Chinese apps such as Douyin and Xiaohongshu are young people’s go-to for information. Despite the US, EU and other pro-Taiwan forces expressing concern about information security hazards and China-friendly narratives, many Taiwanese use them.
Instead of adopting a black-and-white approach of banning these apps outright — which would only trigger protests and condemnation from app users — it would be wiser to allow these companies to set up branches in Taiwan so the government could use regulations and guidelines to oversee them and crack down on fake accounts and rein in disinformation.
As these apps’s algorithms tend to “mute” some voices while amplifying others, echo chambers and bubbles have been created, with young people seeing “filtered” information in line with their values and opinions without access to competing perspectives. As social media have long been the TPP’s forte, young people have favored it over other political parties, and the election results confirm this: It secured more than half the votes of people younger than 35.
This is a warning for the DPP, as it appears to have lost young people’s support to the TPP when compared with President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) young voter support in 2020. Unlike the generation that led the Sunflower movement, the present young generation is composed of people who want to maintain the “status quo,” are aloof on politics, and prioritize the economy and daily life. Being born into a democratic society, they are not as aware of democracy’s frailty as their predecessors, and they tend to demonstrate young people’s nature of supporting those who promise to defy established systems.
TV news pundit and Taiwan Thinktank chief strategist Wang Yi-chuan (王義川) said he received a letter from a young person. The author wrote about many day-to-day issues the DPP has not addressed, but which Ko promised to reform, such as inflation, high rent, low wages, and judicial and education reform.
Despite the DPP’s exceptional accomplishments in diplomacy and the broader economy, young people tend not to recognize those feats. In other words, they consider the government to be out of touch — one of the reasons a large percentage of them have turned their backs on the DPP.
The DPP needs to step up its soul-searching, address issues affecting young people and communicate with them. Only by rekindling that touch and rapport can it reclaim the passion and confidence it once ignited.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
The central bank has launched a redesign of the New Taiwan dollar banknotes, prompting questions from Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — “Are we not promoting digital payments? Why spend NT$5 billion on a redesign?” Many assume that cash will disappear in the digital age, but they forget that it represents the ultimate trust in the system. Banknotes do not become obsolete, they do not crash, they cannot be frozen and they leave no record of transactions. They remain the cleanest means of exchange in a free society. In a fully digitized world, every purchase, donation and action leaves behind data.
RSS